Methodological Considerations in Canine Olfactory Detection Research

被引:41
|
作者
Lazarowski, Lucia [1 ]
Krichbaum, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
DeGreeff, Lauryn E. [3 ]
Simon, Alison [4 ]
Singletary, Melissa [1 ,5 ]
Angle, Craig [1 ]
Waggoner, L. Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Coll Vet Med, Canine Performance Sci Program, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, Coll Liberal Arts, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[3] US Naval Res Lab, Chem Div, Washington, DC USA
[4] AGS Forens LLC, Washington, DC USA
[5] Auburn Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Anat Physiol & Pharmacol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
detection dogs; olfaction; scent detection; canine olfaction testing; animal behavior; ODOR SIGNATURE CHEMICALS; SCENT-DETECTION DOGS; EXPLOSIVES-DETECTION; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN REMAINS; AMYL ACETATE; IDENTIFICATION; FAMILIARIS; DISCRIMINATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2020.00408
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Dogs are increasingly used in a wide range of detection tasks including explosives, narcotics, medical, and wildlife detection. Research on detection dog performance is important to understand olfactory capabilities, behavioral characteristics, improve training, expand deployment practices, and advance applied canine technologies. As such, it is important to understand the influence of specific variables on the quantification of detection dog performance such as test design, experimental controls, odor characteristics, and statistical analysis. Methods for testing canine scent detection vary influencing the outcome metrics of performance and the validity of results. Operators, management teams, policy makers, and law enforcement rely on scientific data to make decisions, design policies, and advance canine technologies. A lack of scientific information and standardized protocols in the detector dog industry adds difficulty and inaccuracies when making informed decisions about capability, vulnerability, and risk analysis. Therefore, the aim of this review is to highlight important methodological issues and expand on considerations for conducting scientifically valid detection dog research.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methodological considerations in conducting an olfactory fMRI study
    Vedaei, Faezeh
    Fakhri, Mohammad
    Harirchian, Mohammad Hossein
    Firouznia, Kavous
    Lotfi, Yones
    Oghabian, Mohammad Ali
    BEHAVIOURAL NEUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) : 267 - 276
  • [2] Conceptual and methodological considerations in current research on (psychophysiological) detection of deception
    Ben-Shakhar, G.
    Meijer, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (03) : 305 - 305
  • [3] Editorial: Canine Olfactory Detection
    Guest, Claire
    Otto, Cynthia M.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [4] Olfactory dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders: Review and methodological considerations
    Martzke, JS
    Kopala, LC
    Good, KP
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 42 (08) : 721 - 732
  • [5] Playware Research - Methodological Considerations
    Lund, Henrik Hautop
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL LIFE AND ROBOTICS (ICAROB 2014), 2014, : 1 - 4
  • [6] Playware Research - Methodological Considerations
    Lund, Henrik Hautop
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS NETWORKING AND ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2014, 1 (01): : 22 - 26
  • [7] Methodological considerations in Rorschach research
    Weiner, IB
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) : 330 - 337
  • [8] Evidence for canine olfactory detection of melanoma
    Pickel, D
    Manucy, GP
    Walker, DB
    Hall, SB
    Walker, JC
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2004, 89 (1-2) : 107 - 116
  • [9] Canine olfactory detection and its relevance to medical detection
    Jendrny, Paula
    Twele, Friederike
    Meller, Sebastian
    Osterhaus, Albertus Dominicus Marcellinus Eras
    Schalke, Esther
    Volk, Holger Andreas
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [10] The "Secret" in Secretions: Methodological Considerations in Deciphering Primate Olfactory Communication
    Drea, Christine M.
    Boulet, Marylene
    Delbarco-Trillo, Javier
    Greene, Lydia K.
    Sacha, Caitlin R.
    Goodwin, Thomas E.
    Dubay, George R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2013, 75 (07) : 621 - 642