Response Diversity and Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems

被引:122
|
作者
Leslie, Paul [1 ]
McCabe, J. Terrence [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Anthropol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Anthropol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
COMMUNITY-BASED CONSERVATION; LAND-USE CHANGE; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; MAASAI LIVELIHOODS; PROTECTED AREAS; NORTHERN; DIVERSIFICATION; GLOBALIZATION; PASTORALISTS;
D O I
10.1086/669563
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Recent work in ecology suggests that the diversity of responses to environmental change among species contributing to the same ecosystem function can strongly influence ecosystem resilience. To render this important realization more useful for understanding coupled human-natural systems, we broaden the concept of response diversity to include heterogeneity in human decisions and action. Simply put, not all actors respond the same way to challenges, opportunities, and risks. The range, prevalence, and spatial and temporal distributions of different responses may be crucial to the resilience or the transformation of a social-ecological system and thus have a bearing on human vulnerability and well-being in the face of environmental, socioeconomic, and political change. Response diversity can be seen at multiple scales (e. g., household, village, region), and response diversity at one scale may act synergistically with or contrary to the effects of diversity at another scale. Although considerable research on the sources of response diversity has been done, our argument is that the consequences of response diversity warrant closer attention. We illustrate this argument with examples drawn from our studies of two East African pastoral populations and discuss the relationship of response diversity to characteristics of social-ecological systems that can promote or diminish resilience.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 143
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Actors’ diversity and the resilience of social-ecological systems to global change
    Grêt-Regamey A.
    Huber S.H.
    Huber R.
    [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2 (04) : 290 - 297
  • [2] Resilience, Rationalism, and Response in Modern Chinese Social-Ecological Systems
    Denise M. Glover
    Jack P. Hayes
    Stevan Harrell
    [J]. Human Ecology, 2021, 49 : 3 - 5
  • [3] Resilience, Rationalism, and Response in Modern Chinese Social-Ecological Systems
    Glover, Denise M.
    Hayes, Jack P.
    Harrell, Stevan
    [J]. HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2021, 49 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [4] Surrogates for resilience of social-ecological systems
    Carpenter, SR
    Westley, F
    Turner, MG
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2005, 8 (08) : 941 - 944
  • [5] Social learning for resilience in social-ecological systems
    de Kraker, Joop
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 28 : 100 - 107
  • [6] Social-ecological resilience and geomorphic systems
    Chaffin, Brian C.
    Scown, Murray
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2018, 305 : 221 - 230
  • [7] Social Dimensions of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems
    Cinner, Joshua E.
    Barnes, Michele L.
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2019, 1 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [8] Protected areas as social-ecological systems: perspectives from resilience and social-ecological systems theory
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Allen, Craig R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (06) : 1709 - 1717
  • [9] Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems
    Walker, B
    Hollin, CS
    Carpenter, SR
    Kinzig, A
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2004, 9 (02):
  • [10] Resilience and adaptation in the governance of social-ecological systems
    Janssen, Marco A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2011, 5 (02): : 340 - 345