Genomic selection on breeding time in a wild bird population

被引:32
|
作者
Gienapp, Phillip [1 ]
Calus, Mario P. L. [2 ]
Laine, Veronika N. [1 ]
Visser, Marcel E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Ecol NIOO KNAW, Dept Anim Ecol, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Anim Breeding & Genom, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Animal model; GBLUP; genomic breeding values; phenology; quantitative genetic; QUANTITATIVE GENETIC-PARAMETERS; CHANGING ENVIRONMENT; NATURAL-POPULATIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DAIRY-CATTLE; PREDICTION; ACCURACY; HERITABILITY; EVOLUTION; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/evl3.103
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Artificial selection experiments are a powerful tool in evolutionary biology. Selecting individuals based on multimarker genotypes (genomic selection) has several advantages over phenotype-based selection but has, so far, seen very limited use outside animal and plant breeding. Genomic selection depends on the markers tagging the causal loci that underlie the selected trait. Because the number of necessary markers depends, among other factors, on effective population size, genomic selection may be in practice not feasible in wild populations as most wild populations have much higher effective population sizes than domesticated populations. However, the current possibilities of cost-effective high-throughput genotyping could overcome this limitation and thereby make it possible to apply genomic selection also in wild populations. Using a unique dataset of about 2000 wild great tits (Parus major), a small passerine bird, genotyped on a 650 k SNP chip we calculated genomic breeding values for egg-laying date using the so-called GBLUP approach. In this approach, the pedigree-based relatedness matrix of an "animal model," a special form of the mixed model, is replaced by a marker-based relatedness matrix. Using the marker-based relatedness matrix, the model seemed better able to disentangle genetic and permanent environmental effects. We calculated the accuracy of genomic breeding values by correlating them to the phenotypes of individuals whose phenotypes were excluded from the analysis when estimating the genomic breeding values. The obtained accuracy was about 0.20, with very little effect of the used genomic relatedness estimator but a strong effect of the number of SNPs. The obtained accuracy is lower than typically seen in domesticated species but considerable for a trait with low heritability (similar to 0.2) as avian breeding time. Our results show that genomic selection is possible also in wild populations with potentially many applications, which we discuss here.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population
    Doligez, B
    Danchin, E
    Clobert, J
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5584) : 1168 - 1170
  • [2] Selection on heritable phenotypic plasticity in a wild bird population
    Nussey, DH
    Postma, E
    Gienapp, P
    Visser, ME
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5746) : 304 - 306
  • [3] Genomic selection helps accelerate popcorn population breeding
    Schwantes, Ismael Albino
    do Amaral Junior, Antonio Teixeira
    de Almeida Filho, Janeo Eustaquio
    Vivas, Marcelo
    Silva Cabral, Pablo Diego
    Goncalves Guimaraes, Amanda
    de Lima e Silva, Fernando Higino
    Araujo Diniz Santos, Pedro Henrique
    Gonzaga Pereira, Messias
    Pio Viana, Alexandre
    Ferreira Pena, Guilherme
    Alves Ferreira, Fernando Rafael
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2020, 60 (03) : 1373 - 1385
  • [4] Genomic selection for plant breeding with different population structures
    Ferreira Valente, Magno Savio
    Soriano Viana, Jose Marcelo
    Vilela de Resende, Marcos Deon
    Fonseca e Silva, Fabyano
    Gomes Lopes, Maria Teresa
    [J]. PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 51 (11) : 1857 - 1867
  • [5] Stabilizing selection on genomic divergence in a wild fish population
    Neff, BD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (08) : 2381 - 2385
  • [6] Multivariate selection and intersexual genetic constraints in a wild bird population
    Poissant, J.
    Morrissey, M. B.
    Gosler, A. G.
    Slate, J.
    Sheldon, B. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2016, 29 (10) : 2022 - 2035
  • [7] Impacts of environmental heterogeneity on natural selection in a wild bird population
    Houle, Carolyne
    Pelletier, Fanie
    Belisle, Marc
    Garant, Dany
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2020, 74 (06) : 1142 - 1154
  • [8] Genetic and phenotypic responses to genomic selection for timing of breeding in a wild songbird
    Verhagen, Irene
    Gienapp, Phillip
    Laine, Veronika N.
    van Grevenhof, Elizabeth M.
    Mateman, Andrea C.
    van Oers, Kees
    Visser, Marcel E.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 33 (09) : 1708 - 1721
  • [9] Climate change and the risks associated with delayed breeding in a tropical wild bird population
    Senapathi, Deepa
    Nicoll, Malcolm A. C.
    Teplitsky, Celine
    Jones, Carl G.
    Norris, Ken
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 278 (1722) : 3184 - 3190
  • [10] Agriculture modifies the seasonal decline of breeding success in a tropical wild bird population
    Cartwright, Samantha J.
    Nicoll, Malcolm A. C.
    Jones, Carl G.
    Tatayah, Vikash
    Norris, Ken
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2014, 51 (05) : 1387 - 1395