Evaluation of the performance of selected in-house and commercially available PCR and real-time PCR assays for the detection of Leishmania DNA in canine clinical samples

被引:15
|
作者
Andreadou, Margarita [1 ]
Liandris, Emmanouil [1 ]
Kasampalidis, Ioannis N. [1 ]
Taka, Styliani [1 ]
Antoniou, Maria [2 ]
Ntais, Pantelis [2 ]
Vaiopoulou, Anna [3 ]
Theodoropoulos, Georgios [1 ]
Gazouli, Maria [3 ]
Ikonomopoulos, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Athens, Fac Anim Sci & Aquaculture, Lab Anat & Physiol, Athens 11855, Greece
[2] Univ Crete, Fac Med, Lab Clin Bacteriol Parasitol Zoonoses & Geog Med, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
[3] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Biol Lab, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
Leishmania; Molecular detection; PCR; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; INFANTUM; DIAGNOSIS; AREA; DOGS; INFECTION; BLOOD; ENDEMICITY; SEROLOGY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.exppara.2012.05.012
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
Protozoa of the genus Leishmania are the causative agents of leishmaniosis. Although the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has proved very effective in the detection of Leishmania DNA, a standardized method does not exist. In this study we attempt a comparative evaluation between one real time PCR (Method D), two in-house (Methods A and C), and a commercially available PCR assay (Method B) for the detection of Leishmania DNA, in order to support reliable diagnostic investigation of leishmaniosis. This evaluation was performed in regard to relative specificity and sensitivity, minimum detection limit (MDL), repeatability and reproducibility using cultured isolates and clinical samples. All the methods under study produced the expected result with the positive and negative controls. However with regard to clinical samples, Method C showed a statistically significant higher level of positivity. Relative sensitivity and specificity of Methods A. B and D in comparison to C was calculated respectively at 50.7%, 43%, 40%, and 90.8%, 93.4% and 89.5%. The MDL for Methods A-D was defined respectively at 30.7, 5, 3.7, and 5 promastigotes/ml. Repeatability and reproducibility were excellent in all cases with only the exception of Method A regarding reproducibility with a different brand of PCR reagents. The results that were recorded indicate that evaluation of PCR assays before their application for research and clinical diagnosis can provide useful evidence for their reliable application. Within this context the use of internal amplification controls and the confirmation of the specificity of the amplification product is recommended. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 424
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of Tropheryma whipplei in stool samples by one commercial and two in-house real-time PCR assays
    Frickmann, Hagen
    Hanke, Miriam
    Hahn, Andreas
    Schwarz, Norbert G.
    Landt, Olfert
    Moter, Annette
    Kikhney, Judith
    Hinz, Rebecca
    Rojak, Sandra
    Dekker, Denise
    Tannich, Egbert
    Podbielski, Andreas
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2019, 24 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [2] Clinical evaluation of an in-house panfungal real-time PCR assay for the detection of fungal pathogens
    Iris Camp
    Gabriele Manhart
    Claudia Schabereiter-Gurtner
    Kathrin Spettel
    Brigitte Selitsch
    Birgit Willinger
    [J]. Infection, 2020, 48 : 345 - 355
  • [3] Comparative Evaluation of In-House and Commercial Real-Time PCR Methods for the Detection of the BK and JC Viruses in Clinical Samples
    Ozdemir, Mehmet
    Ayan, Ugur
    Sevik, Murat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LABORATORY PHYSICIANS, 2020, 12 (02) : 79 - 83
  • [4] Clinical evaluation of an in-house panfungal real-time PCR assay for the detection of fungal pathogens
    Camp, Iris
    Manhart, Gabriele
    Schabereiter-Gurtner, Claudia
    Spettel, Kathrin
    Selitsch, Brigitte
    Willinger, Birgit
    [J]. INFECTION, 2020, 48 (03) : 345 - 355
  • [5] Inclusivity, exclusivity and limit of detection of commercially available real-time PCR assays for the detection of Salmonella
    Margot, H.
    Stephan, R.
    Guarino, S.
    Jagadeesan, B.
    Chilton, D.
    O'Mahony, E.
    Iversen, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 165 (03) : 221 - 226
  • [6] Performance Evaluation of a Commercial Real-Time PCR Assay and of an In-House Real-Time PCR for Trypanosoma cruzi DNA Detection in a Tropical Medicine Reference Center, Northern Italy
    Longoni, Silvia Stefania
    Pomari, Elena
    Antonelli, Alberto
    Formenti, Fabio
    Silva, Ronaldo
    Tais, Stefano
    Scarso, Salvatore
    Rossolini, Gian Maria
    Angheben, Andrea
    Perandin, Francesca
    [J]. MICROORGANISMS, 2020, 8 (11) : 1 - 12
  • [7] Comparison of Commercial and In-House Real-Time PCR Assays Used for Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae
    Dumke, Roger
    Jacobs, Enno
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (02) : 441 - 444
  • [8] Evaluation of in-house dengue real-time PCR assays in West Java']Java, Indonesia
    Kinanti, Denti R.
    Ahmad, Intan
    Putra, Ramadhani
    Yusmalinar, Sri
    Wibowo, Indra
    Anggraeni, Tjandra
    Dwiartama, Angga
    Tjia, Tommy Octavianus Soetrisno
    Destiani, Putri Cahya
    Khoirunnisa, Karimatu
    Tu, Wu-Chun
    Neoh, Kok-Boon
    Apip, Rosye Arosdiani
    Raksanagara, Ahyani
    Jani, Ira Dewi
    Tisnawati, Yeppi
    Warisman, Aan
    Rostiana, Tita
    Fibriani, Azzania
    [J]. PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [9] Evaluation of an in-house panfungal real-time PCR assay for detection of fungal infections
    Willinger, B.
    Manhart, G.
    Selitsch, B.
    Schabereiter-Gurtner, C.
    [J]. MYCOSES, 2013, 56 : 83 - 83
  • [10] Comparison of Multiplex Nested PCR, In-house Real-Time PCR and Commercial Real-Time PCR Methods for the Detection of Plasmodium spp. from Blood Samples
    Usluca, Selma
    Celebi, Bekir
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2020, 54 (02): : 306 - 317