共 50 条
Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review
被引:200
|作者:
Dobson, F.
[1
]
Hinman, R. S.
[1
]
Hall, M.
[1
]
Terwee, C. B.
[2
]
Roos, E. M.
[3
]
Bennell, K. L.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Exercise & Sports Med, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Epidemiol & Biostatist, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ So Denmark, Inst Sports Sci & Clin Biomech, Odense, Denmark
基金:
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词:
Performance-based measures;
Physical function;
Measurement properties;
Clinimetrics;
Systematic review;
Osteoarthritis;
METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY;
CLINICAL-TRIALS;
COMPARATIVE RESPONSIVENESS;
INTERRATER RELIABILITY;
ASSESSING DISABILITY;
COSMIN CHECKLIST;
OUTCOME MEASURES;
VALIDITY;
TESTS;
SCORE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.015
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objectives: To systematically review the measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO up to the end of June 2012. Two reviewers independently rated measurement properties using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instrument (COSMIN). "Best evidence synthesis" was made using COSMIN outcomes and the quality of findings. Results: Twenty-four out of 1792 publications were eligible for inclusion. Twenty-one performance-based measures were evaluated including 15 single-activity measures and six multi-activity measures. Measurement properties evaluated included internal consistency (three measures), reliability (16 measures), measurement error (14 measures), validity (nine measures), responsiveness (12 measures) and interpretability (three measures). A positive rating was given to only 16% of possible measurement ratings. Evidence for the majority of measurement properties of tests reported in the review has yet to be determined. On balance of the limited evidence, the 40 m self-paced test was the best rated walk test, the 30 s-chair stand test and timed up and go test were the best rated sit to stand tests, and the Stratford battery, Physical Activity Restrictions and Functional Assessment System were the best rated multi-activity measures. Conclusion: Further good quality research investigating measurement properties of performance measures, including responsiveness and interpretability in people with hip and/or knee OA, is needed. Consensus on which combination of measures will best assess physical function in people with hip/and or knee OA is urgently required. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Osteoarthritis Research Society International. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1548 / 1562
页数:15
相关论文