Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. II. A case series of infrabony defects

被引:32
|
作者
Kim, TS
Holle, R
Hausmann, E
Eickholz, P
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Operat Dent & Periodontol, Sect Periodontol, Clin Dent Med Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Gesell Strahlenforsch, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Med Informat & Hlth Serv Res, Neuherberg, Germany
[3] Comp Anal Plus, Amherst, NY USA
[4] SUNY Buffalo, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Biol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
bone density; guided tissue regeneration; membranes; artificial; barrier; bioabsorbable; polytetrafluoroethylene/therapeutic use; follow-up studies;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2002.73.4.450
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this 5-year follow-up case series was to clinically and radiographically evaluate the long-term results after guided tissue regeneration (GTR) therapy of infrabony defects using non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. Methods: In 12 patients with advanced chronic periodontitis 12 pairs of contralateral infrabony defects were treated. Within each patient one defect received a non-resorbable (expanded poly tetrafluoroethylene [ePTFE]; control: C) and the other a bioabsorbable (polyglactin 910; test: T) barrier by random assignment. At baseline and at 6 and 60 +/- 3 months after surgery clinical parameters and standardized radiographs were obtained. Gain of bone density within infrabony defects was assessed using subtraction radiography. Results: Eight of 12 patients were available for the 60-month reexaminations. Six and 60 +/- 3 months after GTR therapy statistically significant (P <0.05) vertical attachment (CAL-V) gain was observed in both groups (C6:2.6 +/- 1.4 mm; C60:1.6 +/- 1.5 mm; T6:3.0 +/- 1.7 mm; T60:3.0 +/- 0.7 mm). However at 60 months, 2 infrabony defects in the control group had lost all the attachment that had been gained 6 months after therapy and a clinically relevant but statistically insignificant mean CAL-V loss of 1.0 +/- 2.1 mm was observed from 6 to 60 months. The case series failed to show statistically significant differences between test and control regarding CAL-V gain 60 months after surgery. Also subtraction analysis failed to reveal statistically significant differences regarding density gain between both groups 6 and 60 months postsurgically (C6: 26.4 +/- 54.2, C60 62.8 +/- 112.7, T6:68.7 +/- 72.8, T60. 84.1 +/- 83.6). Conclusions: CAL-V gain achieved after GTR therapy in infrabony defects using both non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers was quite stable after 5 years in 14 of 16 defects.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 459
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. II. Infrabony defects.
    Eickholz, P
    Kim, TS
    Hausmann, E
    Holle, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A291 - A291
  • [2] Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable barriers.: II.: Long-term results in infrabony defects
    Eickholz, P
    Krigar, DM
    Pretzl, B
    Steinbrenner, H
    Dörfer, C
    Kim, TS
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (07) : 957 - 965
  • [3] Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. IV. A case series of infrabony defects after 10 years
    Pretzl, Bernadette
    Kim, Ti-Sun
    Holle, Rolf
    Eickholz, Peter
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 79 (08) : 1491 - 1499
  • [4] Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. I. Class II furcations
    Eickholz, P
    Kim, TS
    Holle, R
    Hausmann, E
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [5] Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. III. Class II furcations after 10 years
    Eickholz, Peter
    Pretzl, Bernadette
    Holle, Rolf
    Kim, Ti-Sun
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (01) : 88 - 94
  • [6] Assessment of guided tissue regeneration procedures in intrabony defects with bioabsorbable and non-resorbable barriers
    Weltman, R
    Trejo, PM
    Morrison, E
    Caffesse, R
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (06) : 582 - 590
  • [7] Clinical comparison of bioabsorbable barriers with non-resorbable barriers in guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of human intrabony defects
    Teparat, T
    Solt, CW
    Claman, LJ
    Beck, FM
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (06) : 632 - 641
  • [8] Long-term evaluation for guided tissue regeneration using non-resorbable membranes
    Takahashi, J
    Saito, A
    Nakagawa, T
    Oshima, M
    Yamanouchi, K
    Yamada, S
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 869 - 869
  • [9] Guided tissue regeneration with non-resorbable and biodegradable barriers: 6 months results
    Eickholz, P
    Kim, TS
    Holle, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (02) : 92 - 101
  • [10] GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION USING BIORESORBABLE AND NON-RESORBABLE DEVICES - INITIAL HEALING AND LONG-TERM RESULTS
    GOTTLOW, J
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1993, 64 (11) : 1157 - 1165