Sub-surface drip fertigation improves seed cotton yield and monetary returns

被引:11
|
作者
Singh, Kulvir [1 ]
Singh, Prabhsimran [1 ]
Singh, Manpreet [2 ]
Mishra, Sudhir Kumar [1 ]
Iqbal, Rana Rashid [3 ]
Al-Ashkar, Ibrahim [4 ]
Habib-ur-Rahman, Muhammad [5 ]
El Sabagh, Ayman [6 ]
机构
[1] Punjab Agr Univ, Reg Res Stn, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[2] Punjab Agr Univ, Reg Res Stn, Abohar, Punjab, India
[3] Univ Swat, Ctr Plant Sci & Biodivers, Charbagh, Pakistan
[4] King Saud Univ, Coll Food & Agr, Dept Plant Prod, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Univ Bonn, Inst Crop Sci & Resource Conservat INRES, Crop Sci, Bonn, Germany
[6] Kafrelsheikh Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agron, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
来源
关键词
bio-physical water productivity; drip fertigation; economic water productivity; nitrogen use efficiency; surface flood method; water use efficiency; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; HELIANTHUS-ANNUUS L; PRODUCTIVITY; IRRIGATION; SOIL; WHEAT; CONSERVATION; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2022.1038163
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Surface flood (SF) method is used to irrigate cotton in India, which results in huge wastage of water besides leaching of nutrients. This necessitates the adoption of efficient management strategies to save scarce water without compromising the yield. Therefore, a 2-year field investigation was conducted under two climatic regimes (Faridkot and Abohar) to study the effect of sub-surface drip fertigation (SSDF) on seed cotton yield (SCY), water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and economic parameters in comparison with SF and surface drip fertigation (SDF). The field experiment had a total of eight treatments arranged in a randomized complete block design. Three levels of sub-surface drip irrigation [(SSDI); i.e., 60%, 80%, and 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc)] and two N fertigation levels [100% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN; i.e., 112.5 kg N ha(-1)) and 75% RDN] made up six treatments, while SF (Control 1) and SDF at 80% ETc (Control 2), both with 100% of RDN, served as the controls. Among irrigation regimes, the SSDI levels of 80% ETc and 100% ETc recorded 18.7% (3,240 kg ha(-1)) and 21.1% (3,305 kg ha(-1)) higher SCY compared with SF (2,728 kg ha(-1)). Water use efficiency under SF (57.0%) was reduced by 34.2%, 40.8%, and 38.2% compared with SSDI's 60 (76.5%), 80 (80.3%), and 100% ETc (78.8%), respectively. Among fertigation levels, NUE was higher by 19.2% under 75% (34.1 kg SCY kg(-1) N) over 100% RDN (28.6 kg SCY kg(-1) N), but later it also registered 11.9% higher SCY, indicating such to be optimum for better productivity. SSDF at 80% ETc along with 112.5 kg N ha(-1) recorded 26.6% better SCY (3455 kg ha(-1)) and 18.5% higher NUE (30.7 kg SCY kg(-1) N) over SF. These findings demonstrate that the application of SSDF could save irrigation water, enhance SCY, and improve the farmers' returns compared with SF. Therefore, in northwestern India, SSDF at 80% ETc along with 112.5 kg N ha(-1) could be a novel water-savvy concept which would be immensely helpful in enhancing cotton productivity.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sub-surface drip fertigation improves seed cotton yield and monetary returns (vol 13, 1038163, 2022)
    Singh, Kulvir
    Singh, Prabhsimran
    Singh, Manpreet
    Mishra, Sudhir Kumar
    Iqbal, Rashid
    Al-Ashkar, Ibrahim
    Habib-ur-Rahman, Muhammad
    Sabagh, Ayman El
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [2] Sub-surface drip-fertigation and legume residue improved maize yield and nitrogen use
    Singh, Arjun
    Dass, Anchal
    Sudhishri, Susama
    Singh, V. K.
    Shekhawat, Kapila
    Meena, M. C.
    Sahoo, R. N.
    Kumar, Soora Naresh
    Upadhyay, P. K.
    Dhar, Shiva
    Nithinkumar, Kadagonda
    [J]. NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2024, 129 (02) : 205 - 221
  • [3] Optimization of N dose in rice under conservation agriculture with sub-surface drip fertigation
    Rana, Biswajit
    Parihar, C. M.
    Nayak, H. S.
    Patra, Kiranmoy
    Singh, V. K.
    Krishnan, P.
    Pandey, Renu
    Rathi, N.
    Meena, B. R.
    Kumar, Anup
    Gupta, N.
    Sidhu, H. S.
    Jat, M. L.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 91 (04): : 509 - 514
  • [4] Management of Cotton Grown Under Overhead Sprinkle and Sub-surface Drip Irrigation
    Nuti, Russell C.
    Casteel, Shaun N.
    Viator, Ryan P.
    Lanier, James E.
    Edmisten, Keith L.
    Jordan, David L.
    Grabow, Garry L.
    Barnes, J. Steve
    Mathews, Jimmy W.
    Wells, Randy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2006, 10 (02): : 76 - 88
  • [5] Drip fertigation improves seed cotton yield, water productivity and profitability of cotton raised under high density planting system in semi-arid environment
    Singh, Kulvir
    Rathore, Pankaj
    Brar, Ajmer Singh
    Mishra, Sudhir Kumar
    [J]. EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2021, 33 (09): : 781 - 793
  • [6] Australian experience with sub-surface drip irrigation
    Clancy, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 1996, 98 (1170): : 307 - 308
  • [7] Emitter spacing, depth of lateral placement, and nutrient levels affect productivity of cotton-wheat cropping system under sub-surface drip fertigation
    Yamini, Vaddula
    Singh, Kulvir
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2024, 295
  • [8] Performance of cotton crop grown under surface irrigation and drip fertigation. I. Seed cotton yield, dry matter production, and lint properties
    Janat, M
    Somi, G
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2001, 32 (19-20) : 3045 - 3061
  • [9] Drip fertigation improves water and nitrogen use efficiency of Bt cotton
    Singh, K.
    Brar, A. S.
    Singh, H. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2018, 73 (05) : 549 - 557
  • [10] Crop performance and nitrogen use-efficiency in maize under conservation agriculture coupled with sub-surface drip fertigation
    Patra, Kiranmoy
    Parihar, C. M.
    Nayak, H. S.
    Rana, Biswajit
    Singh, V. K.
    Krishnan, P.
    Pandey, Renu
    Mandal, B. N.
    Rathi, N.
    Meena, B. R.
    Singh, L. K.
    Sidhu, H. S.
    Jat, M. L.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 91 (03): : 474 - 479