What do the Average Twitterers Say: a Twitter Model for Public Opinion Analysis in the Face of Major Political Events

被引:19
|
作者
Younus, Arjumand [1 ]
Qureshi, M. Atif [1 ]
Asar, Fiza Fatima [2 ]
Azam, Muhammad [3 ]
Saeed, Muhammad [4 ]
Touheed, Nasir [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Business Adm, Fac Comp Sci, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Sch Oriental & African Studies, London, England
[3] UnHuman Prod, Karachi, Pakistan
[4] Univ Karachi, Dept Comp Sci, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词
subjectivity; social features; Twitter;
D O I
10.1109/ASONAM.2011.85
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Social media platforms have become a forum for giving a voice to the masses with a significant proportion of those masses coming from the developing world. This was largely evidenced through the significant role played by social media platforms in the recent uprisings in the Arab world. In this paper, we take up a study of social media engagement patterns of users from the developing world through a study of Twitter's role during the recent Tunisian uprising. Motivated by the results of a user survey conducted mainly for users from the developing world who tweeted heavily during the uprisings in the Arab world, we propose a novel method for subjectivity analysis of tweets corresponding to political events in the developing world. Our proposed method differs from previous subjectivity analysis approaches in that it is the first method that takes into account social features of social media platforms for the subjectivity classification task. Through experimental evaluations, we observe the accuracy of the proposed method to be 83.3% which demonstrates a promising outcome for large-scale application of our proposed subjectivity analysis technique.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 623
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Using Twitter to Characterize Public Opinion in Brazil During Political Events
    Nobre, Gabriel Peres
    Marques Ferreira, Kecia Aline
    Silva, Ismael Santana
    Rodrigues Barbosa, Glivia Angelica
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-COLLABORATION, 2019, 15 (03) : 49 - 61
  • [2] Characterization of Public Opinion on Political Events in Brazil Based on Twitter Data
    Nobre, Gabriel Peres
    Marques Ferreira, Kecia Aline
    Silva, Ismael Santana
    Rodrigues Barbosa, Glivia Angelica
    [J]. COLLABORATION AND TECHNOLOGY (CRIWG 2018), 2018, 11001 : 105 - 116
  • [3] WHAT THEY SAY OR WHAT THEY DO - THE IMPACT OF ELITE EXPLANATION AND POLICY OUTCOMES ON PUBLIC-OPINION
    MCGRAW, KM
    BEST, S
    TIMPONE, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 39 (01) : 53 - 74
  • [4] Public opinion analysis on traffic control under different major public events
    Tang W.-Y.
    Ding Z.-Y.
    Ma J.-X.
    [J]. Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2022, 56 (11): : 2271 - 2279
  • [5] THE EUROPEAN UNION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TURKISH SOCIETY: WHAT DO THE PUBLIC OPINION POLLS SAY?
    Forytek, Lukas
    [J]. POLITICKE VEDY, 2023, 26 (03):
  • [6] A text mining analysis of the change in status of the Hagia Sophia on Twitter: the political discourse and its reflections on the public opinion
    Demirel, Sadettin
    Kahraman, Elif
    Gunduz, Ugur
    [J]. ATLANTIC JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2024, 32 (01) : 63 - 90
  • [7] Research on Public Opinion Analysis Methods in Major Public Health Events: Take COVID-19 Epidemic as an Example
    Han, Keke
    Xing, Ziyao
    Liu, Zhe
    Liu, Junming
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    [J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2021, 23 (02) : 331 - 340
  • [8] Constructing public opinion: How political elites do what they like and why we seem to go along with it.
    Dooley, P
    [J]. JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2002, 79 (01) : 221 - 222
  • [9] Constructing public opinion: how political elites do what they like and why we seem to go along with it.
    Miller, WL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2001, 77 (04) : 986 - 987
  • [10] Constructing public opinion: How political elites do what they like and why we seem to go along with it.
    Bennett, WL
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2002, 66 (02) : 312 - 314