Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Type Classification

被引:0
|
作者
Harlianto, Pramudyana Agus [1 ]
Setiawan, Noor Akhmad [1 ]
Adji, Teguh Bharata [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Dept Elect & Informat Engn, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Classification; Soil Type; Accuracy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Machine learning algorithm can be applied for automating soil type classification. This paper compares several machine learning algorithms for classifying soil type. Algorithms that involve support vector machine (SVM), neural network, decision tree, and naive bayesian are proposed and assessed for this classification. Soil dataset is taken from the real data. Simulation is run by using RapidMiner Studio. The performance observed is the accuracy. The result shows that SVM, with the use of linear function kernel, outperforms the others algorithms. The SVM best accuracy is 82.35%.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 10
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification Problems
    Sekeroglu, Boran
    Hasan, Shakar Sherwan
    Abdullah, Saman Mirza
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTER VISION, VOL 2, 2020, 944 : 491 - 499
  • [2] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Data classification
    ul Hassan, Ch Anwar
    Khan, Muhammad Sufyan
    Shah, Munam Ali
    [J]. 2018 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING (ICAC' 18), 2018, : 270 - 275
  • [3] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Somatotype Classification
    Katovic, Darko
    Cvjetko, Miljenko
    [J]. ICSPORTS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPORT SCIENCES RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT, 2019, : 217 - 223
  • [4] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Shelter Animal Classification
    Mitrovic, Katarina
    Milosevic, Danijela
    Greconici, Marian
    [J]. IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (SACI 2019), 2019, : 211 - 216
  • [5] A comparison of generic machine learning algorithms for image classification
    Marée, R
    Geurts, P
    Visimberga, G
    Piater, J
    Wehenkel, L
    [J]. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS XX, 2004, : 169 - 182
  • [6] Comparison of some machine learning and statistical algorithms for classification and prediction of human cancer type
    Shamsaei, Behrouz
    Gao, Cuilan
    [J]. 2016 3RD IEEE EMBS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2016, : 296 - 299
  • [7] Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms Comparison for Modulation Type Classification for Efficient Cognitive Radio
    Valieva, Inna
    Bjorkman, Mats
    Akerberg, Johan
    Ekstrom, Mikael
    Voitenko, Iurii
    [J]. MILCOM 2019 - 2019 IEEE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (MILCOM), 2019,
  • [8] Comparison of machine learning algorithms for the classification of spinal cord tumor
    Garg, Sheetal
    Raghavan, Bhagyashree
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (02) : 571 - 575
  • [9] An empirical comparison of machine learning algorithms for classification of software requirements
    Li, Law Foong
    Jin-An, Nicholas Chia
    Kasirun, Zarinah Mohd
    Piaw, Chua Yan
    [J]. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2019, 10 (11): : 258 - 263
  • [10] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Penaeid Prawn Species
    Sucharita, V.
    Jyothi, S.
    Rao, P. Venkateswara
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INDIACOM - 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, : 1610 - 1613