Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore Wind Farms: A Case Study of the Zhongying Wind Farm in Eastern China

被引:12
|
作者
Guan, Jinjin [1 ]
Zepp, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Geog, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
关键词
onshore wind farm; community acceptance; wind energy planning; environmental impact; public participation; analysis of variance (ANOVA); regression analysis; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; PROJECT DEVELOPMENT; VISUAL PREFERENCES; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; LOCAL ACCEPTANCE; POWER; GENERATION; ATTITUDES; TURBINES;
D O I
10.3390/su12176894
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The conflict between wind energy expansion and local environmental protection has attracted attention from society and initiated a fierce discussion about the community acceptance of wind farms. There are various empirical studies on factors affecting the public acceptance of wind farms, but little concerning the correlation and significance of factors, especially in a close distance to the wind farms. This paper aims to identify, classify, and analyze the factors affecting community acceptance through literature review, questionnaire, variance analysis, and linear regression analysis. A total of 169 questionnaires was conducted in 17 villages around the Zhongying Wind Farm in Zhejiang Province, China. The factors are categorized into four groups: Location-related factors, demographic factors, environmental impact factors, and public participation factors. Through the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression analysis, the outcome shows the universal rule of community acceptance under the Chinese social background. Finally, recommendations for improving wind farm planning procedures are put forward.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LATENT DYNAMICS IN SITING ONSHORE WIND ENERGY FARMS: A CASE OF A WIND FARM IN SOUTH AFRICA
    Adedeji, Paul A.
    Akinlabi, Stephen
    Madushele, Nkosinathi
    Olatunji, Obafemi O.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 POWER CONFERENCE (POWER2020), 2020,
  • [2] The role of community acceptance in planning outcomes for onshore wind and solar farms: An energy justice analysis
    Roddis, Philippa
    Carver, Stephen
    Dallimer, Martin
    Norman, Paul
    Ziv, Guy
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 226 : 353 - 364
  • [3] Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation for Onshore Wind Farm: A Case Study
    Guan, Jinjin
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2022, 11 (12)
  • [4] Modelling and Performance Analysis of Wind Farms: A Case Study of the Ashegoda Wind Farm in Ethiopia
    Erlich, I.
    Gessesse, B.
    Shewarega, F.
    2012 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION IN AFRICA (POWERAFRICA), 2012,
  • [5] The impact of onshore wind farms on ecological corridors in Ningbo, China
    Guan, Jinjin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 5 (01):
  • [6] Factors affecting the calculation of wind power potentials: A case study of China
    Franke, Katja
    Sensfuss, Frank
    Deac, Gerda
    Kleinschmitt, Christoph
    Ragwitz, Mario
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 149
  • [7] Attitude and acceptance of offshore wind farms-The influence of travel time and wind farm attributes
    Ladenburg, Jacob
    Moller, Bernd
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09): : 4223 - 4235
  • [8] Assessment of Factors Affecting Onshore Wind Power Deployment in India
    Das, Alok
    Jani, Hardik K.
    Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh
    Garlapati, Nagababu
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 185 - 208
  • [9] BIRD-COMMUNITY SHIFTS IN RELATION TO WIND FARMS: A CASE STUDY COMPARING A WIND FARM, CROPLANDS, AND SECONDARY FORESTS IN SOUTHERN MEXICO
    Villegas-Patraca, Rafael
    MacGregor-Fors, Ian
    Ortiz-Martinez, Teresa
    Perez-Sanchez, Clara E.
    Herrera-Alsina, Leonel
    Munoz-Robles, Carlos
    CONDOR, 2012, 114 (04): : 711 - 719
  • [10] Differences in wind farm energy production based on the atmospheric stability dissipation rate: Case study of a 30 MW onshore wind farm
    Kim, Dae-Young
    Kim, Bum-Suk
    ENERGY, 2022, 239