What Are the Risks of Prophylactic Pinning to Prevent Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

被引:49
|
作者
Sankar, Wudbhav N. [1 ]
Novais, Eduardo N. [2 ]
Lee, Christopher [3 ]
Al-Omari, Ali A. [1 ]
Choi, Paul D. [3 ]
Shore, Benjamin J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Childrens Orthopaed Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
[4] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
TERM-FOLLOW-UP; FIXATION; HIP; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-012-2680-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Two decision analyses on managing the contralateral, unaffected hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) have failed to yield consistent recommendations. Missing from both, however, are sufficient data on the risks associated with prophylactic pinning using modern surgical techniques. We determined the incidence and nature of complications after contemporary prophylactic fixation of the contralateral, unaffected hip in patients with a unilateral SCFE. We retrospectively identified and reviewed 99 children (mean age, 11 years; range, 8-15 years) who underwent prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip after treatment of a unilateral SCFE at four tertiary-care children's hospitals from 2001 to 2010. Complications on the prophylactic side, such as avascular necrosis (AVN), chondrolysis, fractures, implant pain, and need for further surgery, were recorded. Minimum followup was 12 months (median, 26 months; range, 12-110 months). On the prophylactic side, we found two cases of focal AVN (2%) and no cases of chondrolysis (0%). Two patients sustained periimplant femur fractures (2%). Three patients had symptomatic hardware (3%), two of whom required surgery for implant removal. In three patients (3%), growth occurred off the end of the prophylactic screw before physeal closure, but they did not require revision fixation. No patients developed a subsequent slip on the side of the prophylactic pinning. While prophylactic pinning prevents SCFE, it is not an entirely benign procedure. The possibility of developing complications such as AVN and periimplant fracture should be considered when determining the best management for the contralateral hip in patients who present with unilateral SCFE. Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:2118 / 2123
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis
    Kocher, MS
    Bishop, JA
    Hresko, MT
    Millis, MB
    Kim, YJ
    Kasser, JR
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (12): : 2658 - 2665
  • [2] Prophylactic contralateral osteosynthesis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis
    Ghanem, I
    Damsin, JP
    Carlioz, H
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 1996, 82 (02): : 130 - 136
  • [3] Pinning the slipped and contralateral hips in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis
    Hagglund, G.
    JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 11 (02) : 110 - 113
  • [4] Prophylactic pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: does it affect proximal femoral morphology?
    Cousins, Gerard R.
    Campbell, Donald M.
    Wilson, Neil I. L.
    Maclean, Jamie G. B.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2016, 25 (03): : 202 - 206
  • [5] Epidemiological perspective on prophylactic pinning in patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis
    Castro, FP
    Bennett, JT
    Doulens, K
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2000, 20 (06) : 745 - 748
  • [6] In situ pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis
    Iida, Satoshi
    Shinada, Yoshiyuki
    TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITIC CHANGE IN THE HIP: JOINT PRESERVATION OR JOINT REPLACEMENT?, 2007, : 61 - +
  • [7] The role of prophylactic pinning in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis -: a case report
    Plötz, GMJ
    Prymka, M
    Hassenpflug, J
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 70 (06): : 631 - 634
  • [8] Risk-benefit analysis of prophylactic pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis
    Seller, K
    Raab, P
    Wild, A
    Krauspe, R
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2001, 10 (03): : 192 - 196
  • [9] The contralateral slip - An avoidable complication and indication for prophylactic, pinning in slipped upper femoral epiphysis
    MacLean, J. G. B.
    Reddy, S. K.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (11): : 1497 - 1501
  • [10] The contralateral hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis
    Hagglund, G
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 1996, 5 (03): : 158 - 161