Effect of perturbations on debris-to-debris orbital transfers: A quantitative analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Kumar, Kartik [1 ,2 ]
Hekma, Enne [2 ]
Agrawal, Abhishek [2 ]
Topputo, Francesco [3 ]
机构
[1] Dinam Srl, Via R Morghen 13, I-20158 Milan, Italy
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Kluyverweg 1, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
[3] Politecn Milan, Via G La Masa 34, I-20156 Milan, Italy
关键词
Space debris; Active debris removal; Mission design; Orbital perturbations; Lambert solver; SGP4; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.015
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
We investigated the applicability of the Lambert solver (Izzo, 2014) for preliminary design of Multi-Target Active Debris Removal missions. Firstly, we computed approximate to 25 million debris-to-debris transfers using the Lambert solver for selected sets of debris objects in Low Earth Orbit, Geostationary Transfer Orbit, and Geosynchronous Orbit. Subsequently, we propagated the departure states of the Lambert transfers below selected Delta V cut-offs using the SGP4/SDP4 propagator (Vallado et al., 2006). We recorded the arrival position and velocity error vectors incurred by neglecting perturbations and analyzed the results for each orbital regime. Our results indicate that perturbations can play a significant role in determining the feasibility of debris-to-debris transfers. By using the Lambert solver and neglecting perturbations, the errors in the arrival position and velocity for individual legs can be large. The largest errors were obtained for transfers between debris objects in Sun-Synchronous Orbit (O(100) km error in magnitude of position vector and O(0.1) km/s error in magnitude of velocity vector). Hence, solely employing the Lambert solver to rank transfer legs could lead to incorrect choices for sequencing of multi-target trajectories. This is particularly relevant for transfers in Low Earth Orbit, where the effects of perturbations are the strongest. (C) 2016 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1303
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simple ΔV Approximation for Optimization of Debris-to-Debris Transfers
    Shen, Hong-Xin
    Casalino, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2021, 58 (02) : 575 - 580
  • [2] PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF ORBITAL DEBRIS AND ORBITAL DEBRIS CLOUDS
    ANZMEADOR, PD
    MATNEY, MJ
    KESSLER, DJ
    SPACE DEBRIS, 1995, 16 (11): : 113 - 117
  • [3] Value analysis for orbital debris removal
    Vance, Leonard
    Mense, Allan
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2013, 52 (04) : 685 - 695
  • [4] Orbital debris-debris collision avoidance
    Mason, James
    Stupl, Jan
    Marshall, William
    Levit, Creon
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (10) : 1643 - 1655
  • [5] ORBITAL DEBRIS - PREFACE
    SAX, H
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 1993, 31 : 169 - 169
  • [6] ORBITAL DEBRIS PROJECTIONS
    LOFTUS, JP
    AEROSPACE AMERICA, 1989, 27 (06) : 6 - 6
  • [7] Preparing for orbital debris
    不详
    AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 1999, 19 (06) : 29 - 29
  • [8] Debris families observed by the Haystack orbital debris radar
    NASA Johnson Space Cent, Houston, United States
    Acta Astronaut, 1 (53-56):
  • [9] Prioritizing Orbital Debris for Active Debris Removal Missions
    Hakima, Houman
    Emami, M. Reza
    2017 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2017,
  • [10] Debris families observed by the haystack orbital debris radar
    Stansberry, G
    Matney, M
    Settecerri, T
    Bade, A
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 1997, 41 (01) : 53 - 56