共 50 条
Efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 3-month versus 1-month formulation in patients with schizophrenia: comparison between European and non-European population
被引:4
|作者:
Savitz, Adam J.
[1
]
Xu, Haiyan
[1
]
Gopal, Srihari
[1
]
Nuamah, Isaac
[1
]
Ravenstijn, Paulien
[2
]
Hough, David
[1
]
Hargarter, Ludger
[3
]
机构:
[1] Janssen Res & Dev LLC, Raritan, NJ USA
[2] Janssen Res & Dev, Beerse, Belgium
[3] Janssen Cilag EMEA, Med & Sci Affairs, Neuss, Germany
来源:
关键词:
long-acting injectable;
non-inferiority;
randomized;
relapse;
tolerability;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
PLACEBO;
RELAPSE;
REHOSPITALIZATION;
ANTIPSYCHOTICS;
TOLERABILITY;
TIME;
D O I:
10.2147/NDT.S189668
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Purpose: This randomized, double-blind (DB), non-inferiority phase 3 study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) vs 1-month formulation (PP1M) in European and non-European patients with schizophrenia. Patients and methods: In this randomized, DB, parallel-group study, adult patients (18-70 years) with schizophrenia (per DSM-IV-TR) having Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score between 70 and 120; previously stabilized on PP1M were enrolled. The study had 4 phases: screening (3 weeks), open-label (OL) stabilization (17 weeks), DB (48 weeks) and follow-up (4 12 weeks) phase. Patients were treated with fixed-dose PP3M (175 525 mg eq deltoid/gluteal) or PP1M (50 150 mg eq deltoid/gluteal) for 48 weeks in DB phase. Results: In total, 487 European (PP3M, n=242; PP1M, n=245) and 508 non-European patients (PP3M, t - 241; PP1M, n=267) entered DB phase (modified intent-to-treat (mITT) [DB] analysis set). Among the 508 non-European patients in mITT set, 67.7% were from Asia (n=344) and 32.3% were from rest of world (ROW, n=164). During the DB phase, similar percentage of Europeans (PP3M: 7%; PP1M: 8%) and non-Europeans (PP3M: 9%; PP1M: 10%) experienced relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate PP3M-PP1M [95% CI] of percentage of relapse-free patients at the end of DB phase [primary endpoint]: European: 1.0% [-4.3%; 6.2%]; non-European: 1.4% [-4.4%; 7.1%]; Asian: 1.6% [-5.7%; 9.0%]; and ROW: 1.4% [-7.0%, 9.8%], per-protocol analysis set). Incidence o f treatment-emergent adverse events (TEA Es) was lower in Europeans (PP3M: 56%, PP1M: 59%) than non-Europeans (PP3M: 80%, PP1M: 73%). The most commonly reported TEAE was weight gain. Conclusion: PP3M showed similar efficacy to PP1M in Europeans and non-Europeans, consistent with non-inferiority of PP3M to PP1M observed in overall population. Rates of AEs were higher in non-Europeans. However, weight gain was greater in non-Europeans, especially the Asian population.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 602
页数:16
相关论文