Incorporating population viability models into species status assessment and listing decisions under the US Endangered Species Act

被引:36
|
作者
McGowan, Conor P. [1 ]
Allan, Nathan [2 ]
Servoss, Jeff [3 ]
Hedwall, Shaula [4 ]
Wooldridge, Brian [4 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, US Geol Survey, Alabama Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] US Fish & Wildlife Serv Southwest Reg, Ecol Serv, Austin, TX 78613 USA
[3] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Arizona Ecol Serv Off, Tucson, AZ 85745 USA
[4] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Arizona Ecol Serv Off, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA
来源
关键词
Climate effects on viability; Endangered species listing decisions; Parametric uncertainty; Sensitivity analysis; Sonora desert tortoise; RECOVERY CRITERIA; EXTINCTION; SURVIVAL; CLIMATE; DESERT; RARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2017.09.004
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Assessment of a species' status is a key part of management decision making for endangered and threatened species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Predicting the future state of the species is an essential part of species status assessment, and projection models can play an important role in developing predictions. We built a stochastic simulation model that incorporated parametric and environmental uncertainty to predict the probable future status of the Sonoran desert tortoise in the southwestern United States and North Central Mexico. Sonoran desert tortoise was a Candidate species for listing under the Endangered Species Act, and decision makers wanted to use model predictions in their decision making process. The model accounted for future habitat loss and possible effects of climate change induced droughts to predict future population growth rates, abundances, and quasi-extinction probabilities. Our model predicts that the population will likely decline over the next few decades, but there is very low probability of quasi-extinction less than 75 years into the future. Increases in drought frequency and intensity may increase extinction risk for the species. Our model helped decision makers predict and characterize uncertainty about the future status of the species in their listing decision. We incorporated complex ecological processes (e.g., climate change effects on tortoises) in transparent and explicit ways tailored to support decision making processes related to endangered species. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 130
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a Species Status Assessment Process for Decisions under the US Endangered Species Act
    Smith, David R.
    Allan, Nathan L.
    McGowan, Conor P.
    Szymanski, Jennifer A.
    Oetker, Susan R.
    Bell, Heather M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (01): : 302 - 320
  • [2] Factors Associated with Listing Decisions under the US Endangered Species Act
    Smith-Hicks, Kathryn N.
    Morrison, Michael L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 67 (04) : 563 - 573
  • [3] The Use of Population Genetics in Endangered Species Act Listing Decisions
    Kelly, Ryan P.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY, 2010, 37 (04) : 1107 - 1158
  • [4] Genetic data and the listing of species under the US endangered species act
    Fallon, Sylvia M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (05) : 1186 - 1195
  • [5] The potential listing of Acropora species under the US Endangered Species Act
    Precht, WF
    Robbart, ML
    Aronson, RB
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2004, 49 (7-8) : 534 - 536
  • [6] Tracking species recovery status to improve US endangered species act decisions
    Davis, Olivia N.
    Molano-Flores, Brenda
    Li, Ya-Wei
    Allen, Maximilian L.
    Davis, Mark A.
    Mengelkoch, Jean M.
    Parkos III, Joseph J.
    Porreca, Anthony Paul
    Fournier, Auriel M. V.
    Tiemann, Jeremy
    Bried, Jason
    Marcum, Paul B.
    Carroll-Cunningham, Connie J.
    Janssen, Eric D.
    Ulaszek, Eric F.
    McIntyre, Susan
    Price, Edward P. F.
    Nieset, Julie
    Beveroth, Tara
    Di Giovanni, Alexander
    Askren, Ryan J.
    Malanchuk, Luke J.
    Duquette, Jared F.
    Dreslik, Michael J.
    McElrath, Thomas C.
    Stodola, Kirk
    Malcom, Jacob
    Carter, Andrew
    Evansen, Megan
    Gerber, Leah R.
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2024, 6 (08)
  • [7] Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the US Endangered Species Act
    Haig, Susan M.
    Beever, Erik A.
    Chambers, Steven M.
    Draheim, Hope M.
    Dugger, Bruce D.
    Dunham, Susie
    Elliott-Smith, Elise
    Fontaine, Joseph B.
    Kesler, Dylan C.
    Knaus, Brian J.
    Lopes, Iara F.
    Loschl, Pete
    Mullins, Thomas D.
    Sheffield, Lisa M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (06) : 1584 - 1594
  • [8] Factors Associated with Listing Decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
    Kathryn N. Smith-Hicks
    Michael L. Morrison
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2021, 67 : 563 - 573
  • [9] LISTING AND DELISTING THRESHOLDS UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
    Sims, Charles
    Finnoff, David
    Hastings, Alan
    Hochard, Jacob
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 99 (03) : 549 - 570
  • [10] Attributes of preemptive conservation efforts for species precluded from listing under the US Endangered Species Act
    Stanley, Annabelle E.
    Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca
    Treakle, Tyler
    Iacona, Gwenllian D.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2024, 38 (02)