Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using Different Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques

被引:59
|
作者
Basheer, Sana [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiuquan [1 ,2 ]
Farooque, Aitazaz A. [1 ,2 ]
Nawaz, Rana Ali [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Kai [3 ]
Adekanmbi, Toyin [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Suqi [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Canadian Ctr Climate Change & Adaptat, St Peters Bay, PE C0A 2A0, Canada
[2] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Sch Climate Change & Adaptat, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
[3] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Sch Math & Computat Sci, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
[4] Govt Prince Edward Isl, Dept Agr & Land, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6, Canada
关键词
remote sensing; LULC classification; ArcGIS Pro; Google Earth Engine; machine learning; change detection; GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE; RANDOM FOREST; TIME-SERIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CLASSIFICATION; ACCURACY; ALGORITHMS; MANAGEMENT; SURFACE;
D O I
10.3390/rs14194978
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate land use land cover (LULC) classification is vital for the sustainable management of natural resources and to learn how the landscape is changing due to climate. For accurate and efficient LULC classification, high-quality datasets and robust classification methods are required. With the increasing availability of satellite data, geospatial analysis tools, and classification methods, it is essential to systematically assess the performance of different combinations of satellite data and classification methods to help select the best approach for LULC classification. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the LULC classification performance of two commonly used platforms (i.e., ArcGIS Pro and Google Earth Engine) with different satellite datasets (i.e., Landsat, Sentinel, and Planet) through a case study for the city of Charlottetown in Canada. Specifically, three classifiers in ArcGIS Pro, including support vector machine (SVM), maximum likelihood (ML), and random forest/random tree (RF/RT), are utilized to develop LULC maps over the period of 2017-2021. Whereas four classifiers in Google Earth Engine, including SVM, RF/RT, minimum distance (MD), and classification and regression tree (CART), are used to develop LULC maps for the same period. To identify the most efficient and accurate classifier, the overall accuracy and kappa coefficient for each classifier is calculated throughout the study period for all combinations of satellite data, classification platforms, and methods. Change detection is then conducted using the best classifier to quantify the LULC changes over the study period. Results show that the SVM classifier in both ArcGIS Pro and Google Earth Engine presents the best performance compared to other classifiers. In particular, the SVM in ArcGIS Pro shows an overall accuracy of 89% with Landsat, 91% with Sentinel, and 94% with Planet. Similarly, in Google Earth Engine, the SVM shows an accuracy of 87% with Landsat 8 and 92% with Sentinel 2. Furthermore, change detection results show that 13.80% and 14.10% of forest areas have been turned into bare land and urban class, respectively, and 3.90% of the land has been converted into the urban area from 2017 to 2021, suggesting the intensive urbanization. The results of this study will provide the scientific basis for selecting the remote sensing classifier and satellite imagery to develop accurate LULC maps.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land Cover Prediction from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Panda, Abhisek
    Singh, Abhisek
    Kumar, Keshav
    Kumar, Akash
    Uddeshya
    Swetapadma, Aleena
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (ICICCT), 2018, : 1403 - 1407
  • [2] Land-Use Land-Cover Classification by Machine Learning Classifiers for Satellite Observations-A Review
    Talukdar, Swapan
    Singha, Pankaj
    Mahato, Susanta
    Shahfahad
    Pal, Swades
    Liou, Yuei-An
    Rahman, Atiqur
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [3] Guidance on and comparison of machine learning classifiers for Landsat-based land cover and land use mapping
    Shih, Hsiao-chien
    Stow, Douglas A.
    Tsai, Yu Hsin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 40 (04) : 1248 - 1274
  • [4] Hyperion hyperspectral imagery analysis combined with machine learning classifiers for land use/cover mapping
    Petropoulos, George P.
    Arvanitis, Kostas
    Sigrimis, Nick
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (03) : 3800 - 3809
  • [5] Combining Low-Cost UAV Imagery with Machine Learning Classifiers for Accurate Land Use/Land Cover Mapping
    Detsikas, Spyridon E.
    Petropoulos, George P.
    Kalogeropoulos, Kleomenis
    Faraslis, Ioannis
    [J]. EARTH, 2024, 5 (02): : 244 - 254
  • [6] Comparison of Land Cover Classification of Ir Sutami Dam Using Machine Learning and Multisource Satellite Imagery
    Walidaroyani, Ainia
    Ramdani, Fatwa
    Kurniawan, Tri Astoto
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFORMATION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, SIET 2021, 2021, : 184 - 190
  • [7] Land use land cover mapping and snow cover detection in Himalayan region using machine learning and multispectral Sentinel-2 satellite imagery
    Saini R.
    Singh S.
    [J]. International Journal of Information Technology, 2024, 16 (2) : 675 - 686
  • [8] Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Land Cover Changes using Google Earth Engine
    Mangkhaseum, Sackdavong
    Hanazawa, Akitoshi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AEROSPACE ELECTRONICS AND REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY (ICARES 2021), 2021,
  • [9] Land use land cover modeling using optimized machine learning classifiers: a case study of Shiraz, Iran
    Ali Jamali
    [J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2021, 7 : 1539 - 1550
  • [10] Land use land cover modeling using optimized machine learning classifiers: a case study of Shiraz, Iran
    Jamali, Ali
    [J]. MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7 (03) : 1539 - 1550