Important Issues, Some Rhetoric, and a Few Straw Men: A Response to Comments on "Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education"

被引：12

作者：

Worrell, Frank C. ^{[1
,2
]}

Olszewski-Kubilius, Paula ^{[3
,4
]}

Subotnik, Rena F. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Grad Sch Educ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

[3] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Talent Dev, Evanston, IL USA

[4] Northwestern Univ, Sch Educ & Social Policy, Evanston, IL USA

[5] Amer Psychol Assoc, Ctr Gifted Educ Policy, Washington, DC 20036 USA

来源：

GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY | 2012年 / 56卷 / 04期

关键词：

philosophical/theoretical; definition and/or conception of giftedness/talent; special populations/underserved gifted; ACHIEVEMENT; TALENT;

D O I：

10.1177/0016986212456080

中图分类号：

G76 [特殊教育];

学科分类号：

040109 ;

摘要：

In this article, the authors respond to the eight commentaries on "Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science" using several themes to organize their response. These themes include ability, developmental trajectories, effort and opportunity, psychosocial factors, eminence, and equity. The authors reaffirm the contention that eminence is an appropriate standard for assigning the gifted label in individuals with well-developed talents.

引用

页码：224 / 231

页数：8