National School Lunch Nutrition and Cost Profile: A Case Study of the Ghana School Feeding Programme

被引:5
|
作者
Goldsmith, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Andrade, Juan [3 ]
Cornelius, Margaret [2 ]
Asigbee, Mawuli [4 ]
Atim, Philip [4 ]
Tamimie, Courtney [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] USAID Feed Future Innovat Lab Soybean Value Chain, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[4] Catholic Relief Serv, Tamale, Ghana
关键词
school lunch; nutrition; cost; protein; soy; fortification; SOY FLOUR; SENSORY PROPERTIES; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1177/0379572119825960
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Numerous governments in developing countries institute school lunch programs or school feeding programs as a strategy to address high malnutrition and low education rates among children. In 2005, the Ghanaian government launched the Ghana School Feeding Programme (GSFP). The GSFP policy does not document (1) the actual meal and associated nutrient profile received by the student, (2) the cost of the meal ingredients to the caterer who prepares the food, nor (3) the recipe derivations that may supply an enhanced nutritional profile. We address these 3 information gaps by employing a detailed case study of 4 caterers supplying a traditional tomato stew recipe in northern Ghana within GSFP-supported school lunch programs. Specifically, we explore the following propositions: (1) GSFP caterers can deliver a school lunch for under 100 pesewas (1 GH or $0.21 USD) per student; (2) the meal meets the recommended daily allowance for protein; (3) soy can serve as a cost-effective ingredient to fortify the meal in terms of protein level and protein quality; and (4) significant differences exist in the macro- and micronutrient profile due to caterer discretion. We answer the above 4 propositions, and by doing so show the importance of accurately measuring the nutritional content, costs, and quantities of the actual school lunch under study. Second, among our results, we show the economy of locally produced soy flour as an ingredient that can lower costs and raise nutrition when substituting for other locally produced proteins such as ground beef and mackerel.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 55
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The challenges and prospects of the school feeding programme in Northern Ghana
    Sulemana, Mohammed
    Ngah, Ibrahim
    Majid, M. Rafee
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2013, 23 (03) : 422 - 432
  • [2] Variability in Dietary Quality of Elementary School Lunch Menus with Changes in National School Lunch Program Nutrition Standards
    Patel, Kajal J.
    Strait, Katie M.
    Hildebrand, Deana A.
    Amaya, Lauren L.
    Joyce, Jillian M.
    [J]. CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NUTRITION, 2020, 4 (09):
  • [3] Commentary on Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs
    French, Simone A.
    Story, Mary
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2013, 167 (01) : 8 - 9
  • [4] WHO BENEFITS FROM SCHOOL FEEDING - AN ANALYSIS OF PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM
    AKIN, J
    GUILKEY, D
    POPKIN, B
    BASS, J
    HAINES, P
    [J]. FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 35 (09) : 70 - &
  • [5] NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM
    TAENZLER, SA
    [J]. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1970, 119 (02) : 372 - 388
  • [6] NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM
    AGRAN, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 1969, 39 (07) : 440 - 448
  • [7] What Are the New National School Lunch and Breakfast Program Nutrition Standards?
    Marcason, Wendy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2012, 112 (07) : 1112 - 1112
  • [8] National School Lunch Nutrition Standards: Making Kids Hungry or Healthy?
    Godfrey, Jodi R.
    [J]. CHILDHOOD OBESITY, 2013, 9 (01) : 71 - 73
  • [9] NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM AND INDIAN SCHOOL CHILDREN
    LUKACZER, M
    [J]. INDIAN HISTORIAN, 1974, 7 (01): : 17 - 23
  • [10] National School Feeding Programme (PNAE) and Sustainability: The Case of Marechal Candido Rondon County
    Pierre-Henri Constanty, Hadrien Francois
    Zonin, Wilson Joao
    [J]. DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2016, 36 : 371 - 392