New Uses of Old Tools? Greenhouse Gas Mitigation with Agriculture Sector Policies

被引:5
|
作者
Jones, Carol Adaire [1 ]
Nickerson, Cynthia J. [1 ]
Heisey, Paul W. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA, Econ Res Serv, Washington, DC 20250 USA
关键词
Climate change; Greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation; Agriculture and forestry sector; Bioenergy policy; Conservation programs; Agricultural RD programs; Q16; Q42; Q54; Q58; CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM; LAND-USE CHANGE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; UNITED-STATES; SOIL CARBON; EMISSIONS; SLIPPAGE; PRODUCTIVITY; PARTICIPATION; ADDITIONALITY;
D O I
10.1093/aepp/ppt020
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Following the failure of legislative proposals for a multi-sector greenhouse gas (GHG) cap-and-trade policy, the shift in focus to energy sector policies ignores the perhaps substantial potential for GHG mitigation from agriculture/forestry. We review estimates of the current U.S. agriculture sector contribution to GHG mitigation from a portfolio of existing sector policies in bioenergy, conservation, and research and development to compare accomplishments across programs. We then consider what opportunities and challenges may exist for increasing sector GHG mitigation by retargeting and/or expanding current programsuor for bioenergy-related mitigation, implementing proposed new programsuto serve as an alternative to cap-and-trade.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 434
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture
    Smith, Pete
    Martino, Daniel
    Cai, Zucong
    Gwary, Daniel
    Janzen, Henry
    Kumar, Pushpam
    McCarl, Bruce
    Ogle, Stephen
    O'Mara, Frank
    Rice, Charles
    Scholes, Bob
    Sirotenko, Oleg
    Howden, Mark
    McAllister, Tim
    Pan, Genxing
    Romanenkov, Vladimir
    Schneider, Uwe
    Towprayoon, Sirintornthep
    Wattenbach, Martin
    Smith, Jo
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 363 (1492) : 789 - 813
  • [2] Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry
    Schneider, Uwe A.
    McCarl, Bruce A.
    Schmid, Erwin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 94 (02) : 128 - 140
  • [3] Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation in Agriculture
    Pathak, Himanshu
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 5 (04): : 357 - 358
  • [4] Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Mitigation Measures in Australian Agriculture Sector-A Review
    Panchasara, Heena
    Samrat, Nahidul Hoque
    Islam, Nahina
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 16
  • [5] Greenhouse gases mitigation policies in the agriculture of Aragon, Spain
    Taher Kahil, Mohamed
    Albiac, Jose
    [J]. BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 2 (01): : 49 - 72
  • [6] Implications and future direction of greenhouse gas emission mitigation policies in the building sector of China
    Wang, Tao
    Foliente, Greg
    Song, Xinyi
    Xue, Jiawei
    Fang, Dongping
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 31 : 520 - 530
  • [7] Greenhouse gas mitigation policies and the transportation sector: The role of feedback effects on policy effectiveness
    Stepp, Matthew D.
    Winebrake, James J.
    Hawker, J. Scott
    Skerlos, Steven J.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (07) : 2774 - 2787
  • [8] Estimating ancillary impacts, benefits and costs of greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the transport sector
    Proost, S
    [J]. ANCILLARY BENEFITS AND COSTS OF GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION, 2000, : 211 - 233
  • [9] Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    Desjardins, RL
    Kulshreshtha, SN
    Junkins, B
    Smith, W
    Grant, B
    Boehm, M
    [J]. NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 60 (1-3) : 317 - 326
  • [10] Greenhouse gas mitigation strategies and opportunities for agriculture
    Kwon, Hoyoung
    Liu, Xinyu
    Xu, Hui
    Wang, Michael
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2021, 113 (06) : 4639 - 4647