From Earthquake Source Parameters to Ground-Motion Warnings near You: The ShakeAlert Earthquake Information to Ground-Motion (eqInfo2GM) Method

被引:31
|
作者
Thakoor, Kaveri [1 ]
Andrews, Jennifer [1 ]
Hauksson, Egill [1 ]
Heaton, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Seismol Lab, 1200 East Calif Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CALTECH, Dept Civil & Mech Engn, 1200 East Calif Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
AVERAGE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT; RUPTURE DETECTOR FINDER; REAL-TIME; PREDICTION EQUATIONS; PGV; DEPENDENCE; CALIFORNIA; DISTANCE; SHAKEMAP;
D O I
10.1785/0220180245
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We present a new near-real-time method for converting earthquake source parameters into ground motion (GM) at locations across the west coast of the United States. This method, called earthquake information to ground motion (eqInfo2GM), has been implemented as part of the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning (EEW) system and makes estimated GM accessible to users on the EEW timeframe of seconds, as the U. S. Geological Survey ShakeMap does at higher resolution and accuracy in the minutes following a seismic event. Whereas the higher fidelity ShakeMap comes at the cost of longer processing times, eqInfo2GM effectively provides a predicted ShakeMap before shaking arrives at many locations. We describe key design details, including ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) implemented, modifications made to optimize for speed, and formats created for conveying GMseverity. The GMoutput format determines added latency and reflects a trade-off between speed and accuracy; for our test earthquake data set, added latency is in the 0.01-1.5 s range after earthquake source parameters have been generated. GMPE implementations are validated against predicted ShakeMaps (without observations), with almost all events showing minimal mean shaking intensity level differences, reflecting variations only in treatment of source distances and V-S30 data. Comparison against ShakeMaps computed with observations (a proxy for true GM) show larger differences, demonstrating the challenges of working in the EEW timeframe, when full source characterization and peak ground motion observations are both unavailable. Although specific configurations and features of the method will evolve as the needs of the EEW user community become evident, eqInfo2GM is expected to improve the overall utility of EEWalerts by providing end users with estimates of predicted local GM hazard. Such near-real-time estimates will enable users to decide more accurately what action to take to reduce the impact of imminent, potentially damaging shaking. Supplemental Content: Comparison of behavior of ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) implemented in earthquake information to ground motion (eqInfo2GM) across west coast regions; comparison of the output of eqInfo2GM and ShakeMap for a shallow Cascadia scenario event; comparison of the map and contour outputs of eqInfo2GM for two finite-fault scenarios; information on the historic earthquake events used for offline testing; information on synthetic finite-fault events used for offline testing; information for scenario events used for ground-motion accuracy validation against ShakeMap and internal consistency assessment between contour and map products; example ground-motion message formats for ground-motion map and ground-motion contour outputs.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1257
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Source and ground-motion parameters of the 2011 Lorca earthquake
    Alguacil De la Blanca, Gerardo
    Vidal Sanchez, Francisco
    Stich, Daniel
    Mancilla Perez, Flor De Lis
    Lopez Comino, Jose Angel
    Morales Soto, Jose
    Navarro Bernal, Manuel
    FISICA DE LA TIERRA, 2012, 24 : 41 - 69
  • [2] EARTHQUAKE VIBRATORY GROUND-MOTION INTENSITY ATTENUATION
    YOUNG, GA
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1980, 21 (02): : 205 - 214
  • [3] An Earthquake Ground-Motion Model for Southwest Iberia
    Taherian, Amir
    Silva, Vitor
    Kalakonas, Petros
    Vicente, Romeu
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 114 (05) : 2613 - 2638
  • [4] Ground-motion modeling of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, part II:: Ground-motion estimates for the 1906 earthquake and scenario events
    Aagaard, Brad T.
    Brocher, Thomas M.
    Dolenc, David
    Dreger, Douglas
    Graves, Robert W.
    Harmsen, Stephen
    Hartzell, Stephen
    Larsen, Shawn
    McCandless, Kathleen
    Nilsson, Stefan
    Petersson, N. Anders
    Rodgers, Arthur
    Sjoegreen, Bjoern
    Zoback, Mary Lou
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 98 (02) : 1012 - 1046
  • [5] Sensitivity of ground-motion simulations to earthquake source parameters: A case study for Istanbul, Turkey
    Sorensen, Mathilde B.
    Pulido, Nelson
    Atakan, Kuvvet
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 97 (03) : 881 - 900
  • [6] Sensitivity of ground-motion scenarios to earthquake source parameters in the Tehran metropolitan area, Iran
    Zafarani, H.
    Vahidifard, H.
    Ansari, A.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 43 : 342 - 354
  • [7] Earthquake ground-motion parameters at stiff sites in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    Yoseph, B.
    Ramana, G. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 2 (01) : 45 - 58
  • [9] The Influence of Ground-Motion Variability in Earthquake Loss Modelling
    Julian J. Bommer
    Helen Crowley
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 4 : 231 - 248
  • [10] Ground-Motion Observations of the 2014 South Napa Earthquake
    Baltay, Annemarie S.
    Boatwright, John
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 86 (02) : 355 - 360