Coupling localized Noah-MP-Crop model with the WRF model improved dynamic crop growth simulation across Northeast China

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Lingxue [1 ]
Liu, Ye [2 ]
Liu, Tingxiang [3 ]
Yu, Entao [4 ,5 ]
Bu, Kun [1 ]
Jia, Qingyu [6 ]
Shen, Lidu [7 ]
Zheng, Xingming [1 ]
Zhang, Shuwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Remote Sensing & Geog Informat Res Ctr, Changchun 130102, Peoples R China
[2] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[3] Changchun Normal Univ, Coll Geog Sci, Changchun 130031, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Nansen Zhu Int Res Ctr, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteorol, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[6] China Meteorol Adm, Inst Atmospher Environm, Shenyang 110166, Peoples R China
[7] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cropland and atmosphere interactions; Dynamic crop model; WRF; Crop yield; Northeast China; LAND-COVER CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; IMPACTS; TEMPERATURE; VEGETATION; PATTERNS; MODIS; VARIABILITY; ALGORITHM; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2022.107323
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Northeast China is an important commodity grain base in China and plays an important role in maintaining national and local food security. The intensifying climate variability and strengthening of extreme weather events threaten crop growth and yields in this region. The dynamic crop model coupled into the land surface models showed advances in simulating crop phenology and crop growth response to climate change, however, which was mainly validated for the United States. By comparing with the satellite observed crop growth cycles, we firstly calibrated the parameters for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) coupled Noah-MP-Crop model. Then, we evaluated the performance of the calibrated WRF-Noah-MP-Crop model with the default crop models and the dynamic vegetation models coupled with WRF by comparing our simulations with corre-sponding satellite measurements and meteorological observations. Our results indicated the augmentation of the Noah-MP-Crop model in WRF significantly improved the crop phenology simulation at the beginning and ending time of the growing season compared with the dynamic vegetation model using unmanaged crops. The satellite -calibrated crop parameters substantially improved the simulation of crop growth, plant physiology, and biomass accumulation for both corn and soybean. Coupling the localized dynamic crop model into the WRF led to considerable decreases in the simulated mean-absolute-errors (MAEs) and biases of the leaf area index, evapo-transpiration, and gross primary production compared with the MODIS observed values. Compared with the statistical yield from each province, the modified crop model underestimated the corn yield from 11.1% to 48.6%, whereas overestimated the soybean yield from 16.5% to 162.6%. The coupled WRF-Noah-MP-Crop model with flexible resolutions holds unmatched advantages in estimating and projecting crop growth and yield under future climate change scenarios, which would be critical in ensuring sustainable agricultural development and maintaining future food security.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Noah-MP-Crop: Introducing dynamic crop growth in the Noah-MP land surface model
    Liu, Xing
    Chen, Fei
    Barlage, Michael
    Zhou, Guangsheng
    Niyogi, Dev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (23) : 13953 - 13972
  • [2] Cross-scale evaluation of dynamic crop growth in WRF and Noah-MP-Crop
    Partridge, Trevor F.
    Winter, Jonathan M.
    Kendall, Anthony D.
    Hyndman, David W.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2021, 296
  • [3] Integration of prognostic sowing and harvesting schemes to enhance crop dynamic growth simulation in Noah-MP-Crop model
    Wang, Fei
    Guo, Lifeng
    Lin, Xiaofeng
    Han, Dongrui
    Wang, Meng
    Fang, Jingchun
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 82
  • [4] Enhancing Winter Wheat Representation in Noah-MP-Crop for Improved Dynamic Crop Growth Simulation in the North China Plain
    Wang, Fei
    Li, Yanping
    Li, Zhenhua
    Cai, Xitian
    Lin, Xiaofeng
    Guo, Lifeng
    Han, Dongrui
    Fang, Jingchun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2024, 129 (08)
  • [5] Noah-MP With the Generic Crop Growth Model Gecros in the WRF Model: Effects of Dynamic Crop Growth on Land-Atmosphere Interaction
    Warrach-Sagi, K.
    Ilgwersen, J.
    Schwitalla, T.
    Troost, C.
    Aurbacher, J.
    Jach, L.
    Berger, T.
    Streck, T.
    Wulfmeyerl, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2022, 127 (14)
  • [6] Implementing Dynamic Rooting Depth for Improved Simulation of Soil Moisture and Land Surface Feedbacks in Noah-MP-Crop
    Liu, Xing
    Chen, Fei
    Barlage, Michael
    Niyogi, Dev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [7] Improve the Performance of the Noah-MP-Crop Model by Jointly Assimilating Soil Moisture and Vegetation Phenology Data
    Xu, Tongren
    Chen, Fei
    He, Xinlei
    Barlage, Michael
    Zhang, Zhe
    Liu, Shaomin
    He, Xiangping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [8] Coupling the land surface model Noah-MP with the generic crop growth model Gecros: Model description, calibration and validation
    Ingwersen, J.
    Hoegy, P.
    Wizemann, H. D.
    Warrach-Sagi, K.
    Streck, T.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2018, 262 : 322 - 339
  • [9] Development of a regional crop growth model for Northeast China
    Lenz-Wiedemann, V. I. S.
    Schneider, K.
    Miao, Y.
    Bareth, G.
    [J]. 18TH BIENNIAL ISEM CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL MODELLING FOR GLOBAL CHANGE AND COUPLED HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEM, 2012, 13 : 1946 - 1955
  • [10] Effects of the surface coupling strength in the WRF/Noah-MP model on regional climate simulations over China
    Zhang, Xia
    Chen, Liang
    Ma, Zhuguo
    Duan, Jianping
    Dai, Danqiong
    Zhang, Haoxin
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2022, 59 (1-2) : 331 - 355