Pilot-plant technical assessment of wet flue gas desulfurization using limestone

被引:148
|
作者
Ortiz, FJG
Vidal, F
Ollero, P
Salvador, L
Cortés, V
Giménez, A
机构
[1] Univ Sevilla, Dept Ingn Quim & Ambiental, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] ENDESA, Madrid 28042, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ie051316o
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
An experimental study was performed on a countercurrent pilot-scale packed scrubber for wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD). The flow rate of the treated flue gas was around 300 Nm(3)/h, so the pilot-plant capacity is one of the largest with respect to other published studies on a pilot-plant wet FGD. The tests were carried out at an SO2 inlet concentration of 2000 ppm by changing the recycle slurry pH to around 4.8 and the L/G ratio to between 7.5 and 15. Three types of limestone were tested, obtaining desulfurization efficiencies from 59 to 99%. We show the importance of choosing an appropriate limestone in order to get a better performance from the FGD plant. Thus, it is important to know the reactivity (on a laboratory scale) and the sorbent utilization (on a pilot-plant scale) in order to identify if a limestone is reactive enough and to compare it with another type. In addition, by using the transfer-unit concept, a function has been obtained for the desulfurization efficiency, using the L/G ratio and the recycle slurry pH as independent variables. The Ca/S molar ratio is related to these and to the SO2 removal efficiency. This function, together with a simplified function of the operation variable cost, allows us to determine the pair (L/G ratio and pH) to achieve the desired SO2 removal with the minimum operation cost. Finally, the variable operation costs between packed towers and spray scrubbers have been compared, using as a basis the pilot packed tower and the industrial spray column at the Compostilla Power Station's FGD plant (in Leon, Spain).
引用
收藏
页码:1466 / 1477
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pilot-plant technical assessment of wet flue gas desulfurization using limestone (vol 45, pg 1466, 2006)
    Gutierrrez Ortiz, F. J.
    Vidal, F.
    Ollero, P.
    Salvador, L.
    Cortes, V.
    Gimenez, A.
    Otero, P.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2006, 45 (17) : 6093 - 6093
  • [2] Dynamic Analysis and Identification of a Wet Limestone Flue Gas Desulfurization Pilot Plant
    Villanueva Perales, A. L.
    Ollero, P.
    Gutierrez Ortiz, F. J.
    Vidal, F.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2008, 47 (21) : 8263 - 8272
  • [3] Model Predictive Control of a Wet Limestone Flue Gas Desulfurization Pilot Plant
    Villanueva Perales, A. L.
    Ollero, P.
    Gutierrez Ortiz, F. J.
    Gomez-Barea, A.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2009, 48 (11) : 5399 - 5405
  • [4] Controllability Analysis and Decentralized Control of a Wet Limestone Flue Gas Desulfurization Plant
    Perales, A. L. Villanueva
    Ortiz, F. J. Gutierrez
    Ollero, P.
    Gil, F. Munoz
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2008, 47 (24) : 9931 - 9940
  • [5] Characterization of the reactivity of limestone for wet flue gas desulfurization
    Fellner, P
    Khandl, V
    [J]. CHEMICKE LISTY, 1997, 91 (09): : 787 - 788
  • [6] Experimental investigation and modeling of a wet flue gas desulfurization pilot plant
    Kiil, S
    Michelsen, ML
    Dam-Johansen, K
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1998, 37 (07) : 2792 - 2806
  • [7] IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF WET-LIMESTONE FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION
    Buecker, Brad
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME POWER CONFERENCE 2008, 2008, : 91 - 98
  • [8] MEASURING THE REACTIVITY OF LIMESTONE FOR WET FLUE-GAS DESULFURIZATION
    AHLBECK, J
    ENGMAN, T
    FALTEN, S
    VIHMA, M
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1995, 50 (07) : 1081 - 1089
  • [9] PROCESS MODELING FOR WET LIMESTONE FLUE-GAS DESULFURIZATION
    HARRIES, RR
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1993, 71 (B4) : 289 - 295
  • [10] MODELING OF THE CHEMISTRY OF WET LIMESTONE FLUE-GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEMS
    LITTLEJOHN, D
    CHANG, SG
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 1991, 5 (02) : 249 - 254