Stochastic cognitive mapping to build common ground for selecting cases in research projects

被引:3
|
作者
Tikkanen, Jukka [1 ]
Haara, Arto [2 ]
Dinnie, Liz [3 ]
Reusser, Dominik [4 ]
Hujala, Teppo [1 ]
Kajanus, Miika [5 ]
Kangas, Jyrki [1 ]
Kurttila, Mikko [2 ]
Leskinen, Pekka [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, PL 111, Joensuu 80101, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland, Joensuu, Finland
[3] James Hutton Inst, Dundee, Scotland
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Change, Potsdam, Germany
[5] Savonia Univ Appl Sci, Kuopio, Finland
[6] European Forest Inst, Joensuu, Finland
关键词
Case study; Cognitive mapping; Sampling; Decision analysis; Community-based initiatives; COLLABORATIVE PLANNING METHODS; GRASS-ROOTS INNOVATIONS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COMMUNITY; ENERGY; SUCCESS; CONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-019-01470-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Creating common ground among research groups is a prerequisite for scientifically sound case study research, especially in multi-national and multi-disciplinary research projects. Therefore, this paper proposes a new procedure for case study selection: stochastic cognitive mapping (sCM). sCM complements the previously illustrated conceptual content cognitive mapping (3CM) with email enquiry on concepts and their interconnections, simple multi-attribute rating and stochastic estimation of priorities. The procedure was applied to select case studies in a study on the role of community-based initiatives (CBIs) in societal change towards sustainability. The procedure performed well, based on project members' evaluations, and enabled them to consistently identify a map and ranked list of criteria for selecting case initiatives. Researchers of the project had two to some extent exclusive orientations towards case selection: sampling and searching strategies, i.e. emphasis on the representativeness of a case set or on the features that interesting and useful study cases should possess. Strategies were integrated and CBIs selected through the sequence of snowball, random, and purposive samplings. Moreover, the method and the criteria list are adaptable to support comparable studies across diverse contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 926
页数:14
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Stochastic cognitive mapping to build common ground for selecting cases in research projects
    Jukka Tikkanen
    Arto Haara
    Liz Dinnie
    Dominik Reusser
    Teppo Hujala
    Miika Kajanus
    Jyrki Kangas
    Mikko Kurttila
    Pekka Leskinen
    [J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2019, 19 : 913 - 926
  • [2] On which common ground to build? Transferable knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary sustainability research
    Gabriela Wuelser
    Carolina Adler
    Thomas Breu
    Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn
    Urs Wiesmann
    Christian Pohl
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2021, 16 : 1891 - 1905
  • [3] On which common ground to build? Transferable knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary sustainability research
    Wuelser, Gabriela
    Adler, Carolina
    Breu, Thomas
    Hadorn, Gertrude Hirsch
    Wiesmann, Urs
    Pohl, Christian
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (06) : 1891 - 1905