The impact of immigration under the defined-benefit pension system: An analysis incorporating assimilation costs

被引:1
|
作者
Jinno, Masatoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Toyo Univ, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1128606, Japan
关键词
PUBLIC PENSIONS; MIGRATION; POLICY; WAGES; RATES;
D O I
10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.21
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND Recently, theoretical studies have started a discussion on how the influx of immigrants affects the finances of the host country. OBJECTIVE This paper investigates whether admission of unskilled immigrants, whose children incur assimilation costs in order to become skilled workers, positively influences the net benefits for native residents and immigrants under a defined-benefit pension system (DB system). This paper also compared the results under a DB system with those under a defined-contribution pension system (DC system). METHODS This paper theoretically calculates the net benefits for native residents and immigrants under a DB system and compares the values between under a DB system and under a DC system. RESULTS The study has three main findings. (1) Under a DB system, native residents do not always become net beneficiaries, even if the government admits an unlimited number of immigrants. This is unlike the analysis under the DC system. (2) The net benefits for native residents caused by permitting a small (large) number of immigrants under the DB system becomes higher (lower) than that under the DC system in certain practical situations. (3) Even if all residents who have the right to vote prefer to admit immigrants, there is a possibility that the net benefits for the native residents may be negative. CONCLUSIONS When admitting immigrants, the government must pay attention to the assimilation costs which offspring of immigrants have to pay and the future generation's right to vote because they are the main victims of the loss of benefits caused by the assimilation costs under DB system.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 636
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reforming the defined-benefit pension system
    Wilcox, David W.
    [J]. BROOKINGS PAPERS ON ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, 2006, (01) : 235 - 304
  • [2] Modernizing the defined-benefit pension system - A national concern
    Mulvey, JM
    Fabozzi, FJ
    Pauling, WR
    Simsek, KD
    Zhang, ZJ
    Malik, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2005, 31 (02): : 73 - +
  • [3] Assisting Defined-Benefit Pension Plans
    Mulvey, John M.
    Simsek, Koray D.
    Zhang, Zhuojuan
    Fabozzi, Frank J.
    Pauling, William R.
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 56 (05) : 1066 - 1078
  • [4] On the control of defined-benefit pension plans
    Huang, HC
    Cairns, AJG
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2006, 38 (01): : 113 - 131
  • [5] Errors in the system of defined-benefit pension funds in the Czech Republic
    Kohout, P
    [J]. FINANCE A UVER, 2001, 51 (10): : 542 - 566
  • [6] Minimum funding ratios for defined-benefit pension funds
    Siegmann, Arjen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PENSION ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2011, 10 (03): : 417 - 434
  • [7] Distinguish between Defined-benefit and Defined-contribution Pension Schemes
    李晓楠
    [J]. 海外英语, 2015, (06) : 284 - 285
  • [8] Managing Defined-Benefit Pension Plans: Still Critical and Complex
    Schwartz, William C., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2012, 24 (01): : 35 - 44
  • [9] Retirement Security for Americans and the Role of Defined-Benefit Pension Plans
    DiNapoli, Thomas P.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2012, 72 (04) : 483 - 484
  • [10] Quantifying mortality risk in small defined-benefit pension schemes
    Donnelly, Catherine
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2014, 2014 (01) : 41 - 57