Chapter 3: Choosing the Important Outcomes for a Systematic Review of a Medical Test

被引:5
|
作者
Segal, Jodi B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
systematic review; diagnostic tests; outcomes; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; CANCER; GUIDELINES; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-011-1802-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this chapter of the Evidence-based Practice Centers Methods Guide for Medical Tests, we describe how the decision to use a medical test generates a broad range of outcomes and that each of these outcomes should be considered for inclusion in a systematic review. Awareness of these varied outcomes affects how a decision maker balances the benefits and risks of the test; therefore, a systematic review should present the evidence on these diverse outcomes. The key outcome categories include clinical management outcomes and direct health effects; emotional, social, cognitive, and behavioral responses to testing; legal and ethical outcomes, and costs. We describe the challenges of incorporating these outcomes in a systematic review, suggest a framework for generating potential outcomes for inclusion, and describe the role of stakeholders in choosing the outcomes for study. Finally, we give examples of systematic reviews that either included a range of outcomes or that might have done so. The following are the key messages in this chapter: Consider both the outcomes that are relevant to the process of testing and those that are relevant to the results of the test. Consider inclusion of outcomes in all five domains: clinical management effects, direct test effects; emotional, social, cognitive and behavioral effects; legal and ethical effects, and costs. Consider to which group the outcomes of testing are most relevant. Given resource limitations, prioritize which outcomes to include. This decision depends on the needs of the stakeholder(s), who should be assisted in prioritizing the outcomes for inclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:S20 / S27
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chapter 3: Choosing the Important Outcomes for a Systematic Review of a Medical Test
    Jodi B. Segal
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2012, 27 : 20 - 27
  • [2] Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Gurung, Binu
    Medley, Nancy
    Altman, Doug G.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Clarke, Mike
    Williamson, Paula R.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [3] CHOOSING IMPORTANT HEALTH OUTCOMES FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Gargon, E.
    Gurung, B.
    Medley, N.
    Altman, D.
    Blazeby, J.
    Clarke, M.
    Williamson, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A435 - A435
  • [4] Chapter 6: Assessing Applicability of Medical Test Studies in Systematic Reviews
    K. E. Hartmann
    D. B. Matchar
    S. Chang
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2012, 27 : 39 - 46
  • [5] Chapter 6: Assessing Applicability of Medical Test Studies in Systematic Reviews
    Hartmann, K. E.
    Matchar, D. B.
    Chang, S.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S39 - S46
  • [6] Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
    Davis, Katherine
    Gorst, Sarah L.
    Harman, Nicola
    Smith, Valerie
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Clarke, Mike
    Tunis, Sean
    Williamson, Paula R.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [7] Systematic Review: Efficacy of Medical Therapy on Outcomes Important to Pediatric Patients With X-Linked Hypophosphatemia
    Ali, Dalal S.
    Mirza, Reza D.
    Hussein, Salma
    Alsarraf, Farah
    Alexander, R. Todd
    Abu Alrob, Hajar
    Appelman-Dijkstra, Natasha M.
    Biosse-Duplan, Martin
    Brandi, Maria Luisa
    Carpenter, Thomas O.
    Chaussain, Catherine
    Dandurand, Karel
    Filler, Guido
    Florenzano, Pablo
    Fukumoto, Seiji
    Grasemann, Corinna
    Imel, Erik A.
    de Beur, Suzanne M. Jan
    Morgante, Emmett
    Ward, Leanne M.
    Khan, Aliya A.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2025,
  • [8] Systematic Review: Efficacy of Medical Therapy on Outcomes Important to Adult Patients With X-Linked Hypophosphatemia
    Ali, Dalal S.
    Mirza, Reza D.
    Alsarraf, Farah
    Hussein, Salma
    Abu Alrob, Hajar
    Appelman-Dijkstra, Natasha M.
    Beck-Nielsen, Signe Sparre
    Biosse-Duplan, Martin
    Brandi, Maria Luisa
    Carpenter, Thomas O.
    Chaussain, Catherine
    Cohen-Solal, Martine
    Crowley, Rachel K.
    Dandurand, Karel
    Florenzano, Pablo
    Fukumoto, Seiji
    Gagnon, Claudia
    Goodyer, Paul
    Grasemann, Corinna
    Imel, Erik A.
    de Beur, Suzanne M. Jan
    Lehman, Anna
    Lewiecki, E. Michael
    Morgante, Emmett
    Ward, Leanne M.
    Khan, Aliya A.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2025,
  • [9] Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
    Gorst, Sarah L.
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Clarke, Mike
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (01):
  • [10] Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey
    Gorst, Sarah L.
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Williamson, Paula R.
    TRIALS, 2015, 16