According to Conceptualism, philosophy is an independent discipline that can be pursued from the armchair because philosophy seeks truths that can be discovered purely on the basis of our understanding of expressions and the concepts they express. In his recent book, The Philosophy of Philosophy, Timothy Williamson argues that while philosophy can indeed be pursued from the armchair, we should reject any form of Conceptualism. In this paper, we show that Williamson's arguments against Conceptualism are not successful, and we sketch a way to understand understanding that shows that there is a clear sense in which we can indeed come to know the answers to (many) philosophical questions purely on the basis of understanding.
机构:
Univ Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Tulsa, OK 74135 USAUniv Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Tulsa, OK 74135 USA
Steinheider, Brigitte
Wuestewald, Todd
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Arkansas, Dept Criminal Justice, Ft Smith, AR USAUniv Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Tulsa, OK 74135 USA
Wuestewald, Todd
Boyatzis, Richard E.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Org Behav Psychol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Cognit Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USAUniv Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Tulsa, OK 74135 USA
Boyatzis, Richard E.
Kroutter, Paul
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Broken Arrow Police Dept, Broken Arrow, OK USAUniv Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Tulsa, OK 74135 USA