Thickness of the Bony Otic Capsule: Etiopathogenetic Perspectives on Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

被引:17
|
作者
Park, Joo Hyun [1 ]
Kang, Seong Il [2 ]
Choi, Hyun Seok [2 ]
Lee, Sang Yeon [2 ]
Kim, Ji-Soo [3 ]
Koo, Ja-Won [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Goyang, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, 300 Gumi Dong, Songnam 463707, Kyunggi Do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Neurol, Songnam 463707, Kyunggi Do, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Sensory Organ Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Labyrinth diseases; Superior canal dehiscence syndrome; Pathogenesis; TEMPORAL BONE; VERTIGO; TEGMEN; SOUND;
D O I
10.1159/000371810
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The etiology of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) is controversial. An embryological perspective suggests that SCD may occur through the failure of postnatal bone formation over the superior semicircular canal (SC), whereas an acquired theory suggests that trauma or pressure from the overlying temporal lobe could break or gradually thin the SC. We infer the etiology of SCD by comparing the thickness of the bony otic capsule of the unaffected side of SCD patients with that of non-SCD participants. Twelve SCD patients (13 SCD ears and 11 normal ears) and 34 age-matched controls (68 ears) were included. The control group was subdivided into an aerated group (49 ears) and a nonaerated group (19 ears), as defined by the presence of air cells above the SC. A high-resolution temporal bone CT was performed in all participants. The thicknesses of the SC, horizontal canal (HC) and posterior canal (PC) of the unaffected ears of SCD patients were compared with those of the controls. The SC of the unaffected side in the SCD group (n = 11, 0.41 +/- 0.23 mm) was significantly thinner than the one in the control group (n = 68, 0.64 +/- 0.21 mm, p = 0.002). The HC and PC were also thinner in the SCD group (n = 24, 0.58 +/- 0.11 and 1.39 +/- 0.31 mm, respectively) than in the controls (0.70 +/- 0.08 and 1.61 +/- 0.32 mm; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.005, respectively). The SC, HC and PC thicknesses were also compared between the aerated and nonaerated ears within the control group. The SC was significantly thicker in the aerated group (0.73 +/- 0.14 mm) than in the nonaerated group (0.60 +/- 0.23 mm; p = 0.046); however, no significant difference was observed for the HC and PC thickness (aerated group, n = 49, 0.72 +/- 0.07 and 1.67 +/- 0.34 mm; nonaerated group, n = 19, 0.70 +/- 0.09 and 1.59 +/- 0.34 mm; p = 0.350 and p = 0.428, respectively). The bony otic capsule was significantly thinner in the SCD patients than in the controls. However, even within unaffected individuals, SCs lacking overlying air cells were also thinner than those with overlying air cells. These results suggest that both embryological and acquired factors affect the occurrence of SCD. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 250
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cranial thickness in superior canal dehiscence syndrome: Implications for canal resurfacing surgery
    Friedland, DR
    Michel, MA
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (03) : 346 - 354
  • [2] Superior canal dehiscence syndrome
    Minor, LB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2000, 21 (01): : 9 - 19
  • [3] Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome
    Bi, Wenya Linda
    Brewster, Ryan
    Poe, Dennis
    Vernick, David
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Corrales, C. Eduardo
    Dunn, Ian F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 127 (06) : 1268 - 1276
  • [4] Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
    Steenerson, Kristen K.
    Crane, Benjamin T.
    Minor, Lloyd B.
    SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 40 (01) : 151 - 159
  • [5] Familial Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
    Niesten, Marlien E. F.
    Lookabaugh, Sarah
    Curtin, Hugh
    Merchant, Saumil N.
    McKenna, Michael J.
    Grolman, Wilko
    Lee, Daniel J.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2014, 140 (04) : 363 - 368
  • [6] Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome
    Ramsey, MJ
    McKenna, MJ
    Barker, FG
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 100 (01) : 123 - 124
  • [7] Bilateral superior canal dehiscence syndrome
    Hornibrook, Jeremy
    O'Neill-Kerr, David
    Berry, Latham
    Carroll, Grant
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (1321) : 64 - 68
  • [8] Superior canal dehiscence syndrome: A review
    Suzuki, Mitsuya
    Ota, Yasushi
    Takanami, Taro
    Yoshino, Ryosuke
    Masuda, Hiroaki
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2024, 51 (01) : 113 - 119
  • [9] Dehiscence of the bony roof of the superior semicircular canal in the middle cranial fossa
    Tsunoda, A
    Terasaki, O
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2002, 116 (07): : 514 - 518
  • [10] Revision Surgery for Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome
    Sharon, Jeffrey D.
    Pross, Seth E.
    Ward, Bryan K.
    Carey, John P.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (08) : 1096 - 1103