Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study

被引:16
|
作者
Hinton, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Lin [3 ]
Mahmoudzadeh, Amir Pasha [4 ]
Malkov, Serghei [5 ]
Fan, Bo [1 ]
Greenwood, Heather [2 ]
Joe, Bonnie [2 ]
Lee, Vivian [6 ]
Kerlikowske, Karla [7 ,8 ]
Shepherd, John [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco Berkeley Joint Program, Dept Bioengn, Room A-C106-B,1 Irving St, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] UC San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[4] Accenture, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Appl Mat Inc, Santa Clara, CA USA
[6] UCSF Breast Sci Advocacy Core, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] UCSF, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[8] UCSF, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[9] Univ Hawaii, Canc Epidemiol, Ctr Canc, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
来源
CANCER IMAGING | 2019年 / 19卷 / 1期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Breast Cancer; Masking; Mammography; Interval Cancer; Deep learning; Transfer learning; Neural network; Breast density; BREAST-CANCER; DIABETIC-RETINOPATHY; DENSE BREASTS; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s40644-019-0227-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To determine if mammographic features from deep learning networks can be applied in breast cancer to identify groups at interval invasive cancer risk due to masking beyond using traditional breast density measures. Full-field digital screening mammograms acquired in our clinics between 2006 and 2015 were reviewed. Transfer learning of a deep learning network with weights initialized from ImageNet was performed to classify mammograms that were followed by an invasive interval or screen-detected cancer within 12 months of the mammogram. Hyperparameter optimization was performed and the network was visualized through saliency maps. Prediction loss and accuracy were calculated using this deep learning network. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) values were generated with the outcome of interval cancer using the deep learning network and compared to predictions from conditional logistic regression with errors quantified through contingency tables. Pre-cancer mammograms of 182 interval and 173 screen-detected cancers were split into training/test cases at an 80/20 ratio. Using Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density alone, the ability to correctly classify interval cancers was moderate (AUC = 0.65). The optimized deep learning model achieved an AUC of 0.82. Contingency table analysis showed the network was correctly classifying 75.2% of the mammograms and that incorrect classifications were slightly more common for the interval cancer mammograms. Saliency maps of each cancer case found that local information could highly drive classification of cases more than global image information. Pre-cancerous mammograms contain imaging information beyond breast density that can be identified with deep learning networks to predict the probability of breast cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study
    Benjamin Hinton
    Lin Ma
    Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh
    Serghei Malkov
    Bo Fan
    Heather Greenwood
    Bonnie Joe
    Vivian Lee
    Karla Kerlikowske
    John Shepherd
    Cancer Imaging, 19
  • [2] Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study
    Strand, Fredrik
    Humphreys, Keith
    Cheddad, Abbas
    Tornberg, Sven
    Azavedo, Edward
    Shepherd, John
    Hall, Per
    Czene, Kamila
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 10
  • [3] Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study
    Fredrik Strand
    Keith Humphreys
    Abbas Cheddad
    Sven Törnberg
    Edward Azavedo
    John Shepherd
    Per Hall
    Kamila Czene
    Breast Cancer Research, 18
  • [4] THE CURRENT DETECTABILITY OF BREAST-CANCER IN A MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING-PROGRAM - A REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS MAMMOGRAMS OF INTERVAL AND SCREEN-DETECTED CANCERS
    VANDIJCK, JAAM
    VERBEEK, ALM
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    HOLLAND, R
    CANCER, 1993, 72 (06) : 1933 - 1938
  • [5] Comparison of radiological and histopathological features between interval and screen-detected breast cancers: a retrospective case–control study
    Anna Maria Schirano
    Livia Dell’Aquila
    Giuseppe Melucci
    Roberto Galeotti
    Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, 11 (1):
  • [6] Deep Learning Predicts Interval and Screening-detected Cancer from Screening Mammograms: A Case-Case-Control Study in 6369 Women
    Zhu, Xun
    Wolfgruber, Thomas K.
    Leong, Lambert
    Jensen, Matthew
    Scott, Christopher
    Winham, Stacey
    Sadowski, Peter
    Vachon, Celine
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Shepherd, John A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 301 (03) : 550 - 558
  • [7] Interval Breast Cancers Are Associated with More Aggressive Pathologic Characteristics Compared to Screen-Detected Cancers: A Nested Case Control Study from a Canadian Breast Screening Program
    Rayson, D.
    Payne, J. I.
    Barnes, P. J.
    MacIntoshi, R. F.
    Foley, T.
    Burns, A. M.
    Younis, T.
    Caines, J. S.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 : 63A - 64A
  • [8] Interval Breast Cancers Are Associated with More Aggressive Pathologic Characteristics Compared to Screen-Detected Cancers: A Nested Case Control Study from a Canadian Breast Screening Program
    Rayson, D.
    Payne, J. I.
    Barnes, P. J.
    MacIntosh, R. F.
    Abdolell, M.
    Foley, T.
    Burns, A. M.
    Younis, T.
    Caines, J. S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2009, 89 : 63A - 64A
  • [9] Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers A Case-Control Study
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Mahmoudzadeh, Amir P.
    Ma, Lin
    Winham, Stacey
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Wu, Fang Fang
    Malkov, Serghei
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    Cummings, Steven R.
    Shepherd, John A.
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 168 (11) : 757 - +