Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study

被引:166
|
作者
Aiken, A. R. A. [1 ]
Lohr, P. A. [2 ]
Lord, J. [3 ]
Ghosh, N. [4 ]
Starling, J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] British Pregnancy Advisory Serv, Stratford Upon Avon, England
[3] MSI Reprod Choices, 1 Conway St,Fitzroy Sq, London W1T 6LP, England
[4] Natl Unplanned Pregnancy Advisory Serv NUPAS, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Math Policy Res, Cambridge, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Abortion; induced [E04; 520; 050; ambulatory care facilities [N02; 278; 035; health planning [N03; 349; mifepristone [D04; 210; 500; 365; 415; 580; misoprostol [D23; 469; 700; 660; pregnancy complications [C13; 703; telemedicine [N04; 590; 374; 800; termination of pregnancy; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; MIFEPRISTONE; COMPLICATIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.16668
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare outcomes before and after implementation of medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) without ultrasound via telemedicine. Design Cohort analysis. Setting The three main abortion providers. Population or sample Medical abortions at home at <= 69 days' gestation in two cohorts: traditional model (in-person with ultrasound, n = 22 158) from January to March 2020 versus telemedicine-hybrid model (either in person or via telemedicine without ultrasound, n = 29 984, of whom 18 435 had no-test telemedicine) between April and June 2020. Sample (n = 52 142) comprises 85% of all medical abortions provided nationally. Methods Data from electronic records and incident databases were used to compare outcomes between cohorts, adjusted for baseline differences. Main outcome measures Treatment success, serious adverse events, waiting times, gestation at treatment, acceptability. Results Mean waiting time from referral to treatment was 4.2 days shorter in the telemedicine-hybrid model and more abortions were provided at <= 6 weeks' gestation (40% versus 25%, P < 0.001). Treatment success (98.8% versus 98.2%, P > 0.999), serious adverse events (0.02% versus 0.04%, P = 0.557) and incidence of ectopic pregnancy (0.2% versus 0.2%, P = 0.796) were not different between models. In the telemedicine-hybrid model, 0.04% were estimated to be over 10 weeks' gestation at the time of the abortion; all were completed safely at home. Within the telemedicine-hybrid model, effectiveness was higher with telemedicine than in-person care (99.2% versus 98.1%, P < 0.001). Acceptability of telemedicine was high (96% satisfied) and 80% reported a future preference for telemedicine. Conclusions A telemedicine-hybrid model for medical abortion that includes no-test telemedicine and treatment without an ultrasound is effective, safe, acceptable and improves access to care. Tweetable abstract Compelling evidence from 52 142 women shows no-test telemedicine abortion is safe, effective and improves care.
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1474
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Effectiveness and Acceptability of Medical Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine
    Grossman, Daniel
    Grindlay, Kate
    Buchacker, Todd
    Lane, Kathleen
    Blanchard, Kelly
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (02): : 296 - 303
  • [2] Acceptability of no-test medical abortion provided via telemedicine during Covid-19: analysis of patient-reported outcomes
    Erlank, Chelsey Porter
    Lord, Jonathan
    Church, Kathryn
    [J]. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 47 (04) : 261 - 268
  • [3] Telemedicine for medical abortion service provision in Mexico: A safety, feasibility, and acceptability study
    Pena, Melanie
    Flores, Karla Figueroa
    Ponce, Mariana Munoz
    Serafin, Diana Facio
    Camarillo Zavala, Ana Maria
    Cruz, Cesar Ruiz
    Ortiz Salgado, Irving Geovanni
    Rosado, Yeni Ochoa
    Socarras, Tania
    Lopez, Adrian Pacheco
    Bousieguez, Manuel
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 114 : 67 - 73
  • [4] Safety and effectiveness of medication abortion provided via telemedicine at Planned Parenthood in four US states
    Kohn, J. E.
    Snow, J. L.
    Simons, H. R.
    Seymour, J. W.
    Thompson, T. A.
    Grossman, D.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 99 (05) : 317 - 317
  • [5] Safety and acceptability of medical abortion through telemedicine after 9 weeks of gestation: a population-based cohort study
    Endler, M.
    Beets, L.
    Danielsson, K. Gemzell
    Gomperts, R.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (05) : 609 - 618
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of very early medical termination of pregnancy: a cohort study
    Bizjak, I.
    Fiala, C.
    Berggren, L.
    Hognert, H.
    Saav, I.
    Bring, J.
    Gemzell-Danielsson, K.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (13) : 1993 - 1999
  • [7] Effectiveness and safety of medication abortion via telemedicine versus in-person: A cohort of pregnant people in Colombia
    Cely-Andrade, Leonardo
    Cardenas-Garzon, Karen
    Enriquez-Santander, Luis C.
    Saavedra-Avendano, Biani
    Ortiz-Avendano, Guillermo A.
    Betancourt-Rojas, Lucy A.
    Guerrero-Conde, Jorge G.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 138
  • [8] The efficacy, safety and acceptability of medical termination of pregnancy provided by standard care by doctors or by nurse-midwives: a randomised controlled equivalence trial
    Kallner, H. Kopp
    Gomperts, R.
    Salomonsson, E.
    Johansson, M.
    Marions, L.
    Gemzell-Danielsson, K.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (04) : 510 - 517
  • [9] Safety and effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion provided using online telemedicine in the United States: A population based study
    Aiken, Abigail R. A.
    Romanova, Evdokia P.
    Morber, Julia R.
    Gomperts, Rebecca
    [J]. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS, 2022, 10
  • [10] Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first-trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non-doctor providers: a systematic review
    Sjostrom, S.
    Dragoman, M.
    Fonhus, M. S.
    Ganatra, B.
    Gemzell-Danielsson, K.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (13) : 1928 - 1940