Indexing soil quality: a new paradigm in soil science research

被引:51
|
作者
Erkossa, Teklu
Itanna, Fisseha
Stahr, Karl
机构
[1] Debre Zeit Res Ctr, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia
[2] Univ Addis Ababa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Soil Sci & Land Evaluat, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH | 2007年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
soil quality indicators; land preparation methods; Vertisols; Ethiopia;
D O I
10.1071/SR06064
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil quality indexing is a new approach in spatial and temporal evaluation of land management systems effects on soils' capacity to function. A field experiment was conducted at Caffee Doonsa (2400m.a.s.l., 08 degrees 57'N, 39 degrees 06'E) for 6 years (1998-2003) to compare the effects of land preparation methods on soil quality (SQ) and to test the use of the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) in assessing SQ under the Ethiopian Central Highlands conditions. Four methods of land preparation [ broad bed and furrows (BBF), green manure (GM), ridge and furrows (RF), and reduced tillage (RT)] were arranged in a randomised complete block design with 3 replications on permanent plots (22m by 6 m). Physical, chemical, and biological SQ indicators were determined and scored, and a soil quality index (SQI) was developed using the SMAF procedures. Seven SQ indicators including microbial biomass carbon (MBC), bulk density, aggregate stability (AGG), soil organic carbon (Corg), pH, available water capacity (AWC), and available phosphorus were selected as a minimum dataset. The scored values of the indicators ranged from 0.21 for AGG and 0.97 for pH, both under BBF. Compared with RF ( control), all the alternatives ( GM, BBF, and RT) increased the scores of Corg and MBC. Moreover, BBF and GM increased the score values of AWC and AGG, respectively. Consequently, there was a non-significant increase in SQI due to the use of GM, BBF, and RT compared with the control. As a result, the land preparation methods may be preferred in a decreasing order GM=BBF=RT=RF for the management goal of crop production. The study indicated that SMAF could be a robust tool to assess the performance of land management methods on soil quality in the study area, but some modi. cations may be required to. fit to the prevailing cropping system and soil characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 137
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soil quality in New Zealand: Policy and the science response
    Lilburne, LR
    Hewitt, AE
    Sparling, GP
    Selvarajah, N
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2002, 31 (06) : 1768 - 1773
  • [2] THE SOIL SURVEY AS PARADIGM-BASED SCIENCE
    HUDSON, BD
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1992, 56 (03) : 836 - 841
  • [3] The new soil science
    Brown, PE
    SCIENCE, 1929, 70 : 619 - 622
  • [4] Soil science in transition: Soil awareness and soil care research strategies
    Yaalon, DH
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1996, 161 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [5] Soil quality: Science and process
    Wander, MM
    Walter, GL
    Nissen, TM
    Bollero, GA
    Andrews, SS
    Cavanaugh-Grant, DA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (01) : 23 - 32
  • [6] Norway's Soil and Soil-Science Research
    Dege, Wilhelm
    PETERMANNS GEOGRAPHISCHE MITTEILUNGEN, 1941, 87 (04) : 128 - 130
  • [7] QUATERNARY RESEARCH AND SOIL SCIENCE
    SCHILLING, W
    PETERMANNS GEOGRAPHISCHE MITTEILUNGEN, 1969, 113 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [8] Soil science and environmental research
    Nunez-Delgado, Avelino
    Varjani, Sunita
    Zhou, Yaoyu
    Lopez-Ramon, Victoria
    Zhang, Zhien
    Sanchez-Polo, Manuel
    Race, Marco
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 227
  • [9] Soil research: Science on the edge
    Clothier, B
    Fegent, J
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (04): : I - iii