Producing synthetic natural gas from microalgae via supercritical water gasification: A techno-economic sensitivity analysis

被引:45
|
作者
Brandenberger, M. [1 ]
Matzenberger, J. [1 ]
Vogel, F. [1 ]
Ludwig, Ch. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Gen Energy Res Dept ENE LBK, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn ENAC IIE, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 51卷
关键词
Algae; Synthetic natural gas (SNG); Supercritical water gasification; Sensitivity analysis; Bioenergy; Process economics; CONTINUOUS SALT PRECIPITATION; BIODIESEL; SEPARATION; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.038
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
A techno-economic sensitivity analysis of the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) via catalytic supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of microalgae produced in raceway ponds (RP), tubular-, or flat-panel-airlift photobioreactors (FPA-PBR) has been perfomed. The aim of combining microalgae production with SCWG is to close material flows with respect to water and nutrients, the so called SunCHem process. The sensitivity analysis is based on an annual production of 86,500 t of microalgae biomass yielding 1.14 PJ of methane per year. The sensitivity analysis showed that with an annual algae productivity of 38.5 t per hectare of RP an energy return on energy invested (EROEI) of 1.84 can be achieved for the self-sufficient base case scenario. An SNG production cost of 194 (sic) GJ (1) was obtained for RP. An EROEI of 0.08 was calculated for tubular PBR with a productivity of 75.1 t ha (-1) a(-1) in the base case scenario and thus was found to be inappropriate for SNG production. EROEI for FPA-PBR with an assumed microalgae productivity of 79 t ha (1) a (1) was found to be 1.01 in the base case scenario and an SNG production cost of 266 (sic) GJ (1). With significantly more optimistic assumptions concerning microalgae productivity, energy input and capital requirement with respect to microalgae cultivation, an EROEI of 3.6-5.8 and SNG production costs of 53-90 (sic) GJ (1) were found for RP, whereas for FPA-PBR an EROEI of 2-3.7 and SNG production costs of 30-103 (sic) GJ (1) were obtained. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techno-economic assessment of solar thermal and alternative energy integration in supercritical water gasification of microalgae
    Onigbajumo, Adetunji
    Taghipour, Alireza
    Ramirez, Jerome
    Will, Geoffrey
    Ong, Teng-Cheong
    Couperthwaite, Sara
    Steinberg, Ted
    Rainey, Thomas
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 230
  • [2] Techno-economic feasibility of supercritical water gasification of black liquor
    Ozdenkci, Karhan
    De Blasio, Cataldo
    Sarwar, Golam
    Melin, Kristian
    Koskinen, Jukka
    Alopaeus, Ville
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 189
  • [3] Techno-economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of a conceptual design for supercritical water gasification of soybean straw to produce hydrogen
    Okolie, Jude A.
    Nanda, Sonil
    Dalai, Ajay K.
    Kozinski, Janusz A.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 331
  • [4] Thermodynamic analysis and techno-economic assessment of synthetic natural gas production via ash agglomerating fluidized bed gasification using coal as fuel
    Li, Guang
    Liu, Zheyu
    Liu, Fan
    Weng, Yujing
    Ma, Shuqi
    Zhang, Yulong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (51) : 27359 - 27368
  • [5] Assessment of supercritical water gasification process for combustible gas production from thermodynamic, environmental and techno-economic perspectives: A review
    Chen, Jingwei
    Liang, Jiamin
    Xu, Zhengyong
    E, Jiaqiang
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 226 (226)
  • [6] A TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION FROM MICROALGAE
    Olivieri, Giuseppe
    Guida, Teresa
    Salatino, Piero
    Marzocchella, Antonio
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 12 (08): : 1563 - 1573
  • [7] Optimal design of a coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) process with different coal ranks and gasification technologies via techno-economic analysis
    Zhang, Jingpeng
    Chu, Bozhao
    Li, Zhengwen
    Yan, Binhang
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 183 : 150 - 159
  • [8] Techno-economic Analysis of Distributed Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas
    Luk Ho Ting
    Lei Ho Man
    Ng Wai Yee
    Ju Yihan
    Lam Koon Fung
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 20 (03) : 489 - 496
  • [9] Comparative Techno-economic Analysis of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae via Transesterification Methods
    Bello, Binta Z.
    Nwokoagbara, Ezinne
    Wang, Meihong
    [J]. 22 EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2012, 30 : 132 - 136
  • [10] Techno-economic analysis of ammonia production via integrated biomass gasification
    Andersson, Jim
    Lundgren, Joakim
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 130 : 484 - 490