Vulnerability to tax enforcement and spillovers of corruption: cross-industry evidence from China

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Shawn Xiaoguang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Business Sch, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] CCIE, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
来源
关键词
EVASION; FIRMS; PERFORMANCE; DETERRENCE; TAXATION; CRIME; EXTERNALITIES; GOVERNMENT; EFFICIENCY; TURNOVER;
D O I
10.1093/jleo/ewac019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The article investigates the cross-industry spillover effect of tax enforcement and corruption. I propose a two-sector optimal tax administration model by incorporating vulnerability to tax enforcement (VTE) and corruption into the Allingham-Sandmo framework. Based on two large surveys of Chinese firms, I test the model by using industrial capital-intensity as a proxy for firms' VTE and exploiting turnover of prefectural secretaries of the Communist Party of China between 2000 and 2007 as a driving force of corruption. The findings suggest capital-intensive industries, which are vulnerable to tougher enforcement, pay higher effective tax rates, and, therefore, have stronger incentives to bribe in order to reduce their tax burden. The bribery produces negative spillovers that raise the effective tax rates of their labor-intensive counterparts. Further evidence confirms that older prefectural secretaries are prone to be corrupt and exhibit stronger tenure effects both on the effective tax rates and on firms' corruption expenditure (JEL H21, H26, H32, D22, D73).
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 337
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emission Tax and Compensation Subsidy with Cross-Industry Pollution
    Cheng, Kuang-Feng
    Tsai, Chien-Shu
    Hsu, Chu-Chuan
    Lin, Szu-Chung
    Tsai, Ting-Chung
    Lee, Jen-Yao
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (04)
  • [2] Cross-industry interlinkages in employment growth: Evidence from Brazil
    Carvalho, Daniel R.
    Lee, Jean N.
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 26 (04) : 2021 - 2039
  • [3] The environmental benefit of tax enforcement: evidence from China
    Luo, Yu
    Zhang, Ming-ang
    Zhang, Sihan
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 17 (01) : 78 - 96
  • [4] Industry policy, investor sentiment, and cross-industry capital flow: Evidence from Chinese listed companies' cross-industry M&As
    Hua, Guiru
    Zhou, Shuli
    Zhang, Shiyun
    Wang, Junqiu
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2020, 53
  • [5] Asymmetric Price Adjustment: Cross-Industry Evidence
    Gwin, Carl R.
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2009, 76 (01) : 249 - 265
  • [6] Investment responses to Japanese tax reforms: A cross-industry comparison
    Hamaaki, Junya
    [J]. JAPAN AND THE WORLD ECONOMY, 2008, 20 (04) : 542 - 562
  • [7] Intergovernmental revenue relations, tax enforcement and tax shifting: evidence from China
    Xiao, Chengrui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2020, 27 (01) : 128 - 152
  • [8] Intergovernmental revenue relations, tax enforcement and tax shifting: evidence from China
    Chengrui Xiao
    [J]. International Tax and Public Finance, 2020, 27 : 128 - 152
  • [9] Tax enforcement and corporate financial irregularities: Evidence from China
    Feng, Chen
    Ye, Yongwei
    Bai, Caiquan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 88
  • [10] The cross-industry effects of monetary policy: New evidence from Bangladesh
    Roy, Ripon
    Bashar, Omar H. N. M.
    Bhattacharya, Prasad Sankar
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 127