Fate of phthalates in a river receiving wastewater treatment plant effluent based on a multimedia model

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Chenchen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Yaqi [1 ]
Feng, Lixia [4 ]
Pang, Weiliang [5 ]
Yu, Jingjie [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaopo [1 ,2 ]
Qiu, Chunsheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chaocan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yufei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Chengjian Univ, Sch Environm & Municipal Engn, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Chengjian Univ, Tianjin Key Lab Aquat Sci & Technol, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Key Lab Drinking Water Sci & Technol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin United Environm Protect Engn Design Co Ltd, Tianjin 300191, Peoples R China
[5] Tianjin Acad Environm Sci, Tianjin 300191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fate and transfer; level III fugacity model; phthalic acid esters; receiving river; secondary effluent; sensitivity analysis; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; ACID-ESTERS PAES; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; HEALTH-RISK; SOIL; CITY; SEDIMENTS; EXPOSURE; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2022.347
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Phthalic acid esters (PAEs) can enter environment media by secondary effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) into receiving rivers, thus posing a threat to ecosystem health. A level III fugacity model was established to simulate the fate and transfer of four PAEs in a study area in Tianjin, China, and to evaluate the influence of WWTP discharge on PAEs levels in the receiving river. The results show that the logarithmic residuals of most simulated and measured values of PAEs are within one order of magnitude with a good agreement. PAEs in the study area were mainly distributed in soil and sediment phases, which accounted for 84.66%, 50.26%, 71.96% and 99.09%for dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), respectively. The upstream advection accounted for 77.90%, 93.20%, 90.21% and 90.93% of the total source of DMP, DEP, DBP and DEHP in the river water, respectively, while the contribution of secondary effluent discharge was much lower. Sensitivity analysis shows that emission and inflow parameters have greater influences on the multimedia distributions of PAEs than physicochemical and environmental parameters. Monte Carlo analysis quantifies the uncertainties and verifies the reliability of the simulation results.
引用
收藏
页码:2124 / 2137
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling the fate of nitrogen in a wastewater treatment plant effluent dominant river
    Huang, Jingshui
    Yin, Hailong
    Zhou, Gang
    Xie, Ruyi
    Zhou, Qi
    Li, Yifei
    [J]. Proceedings of the Second Conference of Global Chinese Scholars on Hydrodynamics (CCSH'2016), Vols 1 & 2, 2016, : 1020 - 1027
  • [2] Modeling the fate of a photoproduct of ketoprofen in urban rivers receiving wastewater treatment plant effluent
    Hanamoto, Seiya
    Hasegawa, Eisuke
    Nakada, Norihide
    Yamashita, Naoyuki
    Tanaka, Hiroaki
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 573 : 810 - 816
  • [3] Effects of wastewater treatment plant effluent on microbial risks of pathogens and their antibiotic resistance in the receiving river
    Xiao, Zijian
    Qin, Yuanyuan
    Han, Li
    Liu, Yifan
    Wang, Ziyi
    Huang, Yanping
    Ma, Yujing
    Zou, Yina
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 345
  • [4] Limited nitrogen retention in an urban river receiving raw sewage and wastewater treatment plant effluent
    Huang, Jingshui
    Yin, Hailong
    Jomaa, Seifeddine
    Rode, Michael
    Zhou, Qi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2019, 21 (09) : 1477 - 1488
  • [5] Role of dams in the phase transfer of antibiotics in an urban river receiving wastewater treatment plant effluent
    Guo, Xiaoyu
    Feng, Chenghong
    Zhang, Jianhong
    Tian, Chenhao
    Liu, Jingling
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 607 : 1173 - 1179
  • [6] Physicochemical and bacteriological assessment of Wupa wastewater treatment plant effluent and the effluent-receiving Wupa River in Abuja, Nigeria
    Ini-Abasi I. Ibangha
    Stella N. Madueke
    Sunday O. Akachukwu
    Stella C. Onyeiwu
    Simeon C. Enemuor
    Vincent N. Chigor
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196
  • [7] Physicochemical and bacteriological assessment of Wupa wastewater treatment plant effluent and the effluent-receiving Wupa River in Abuja, Nigeria
    Ibangha, Ini-Abasi I.
    Madueke, Stella N.
    Akachukwu, Sunday O.
    Onyeiwu, Stella C.
    Enemuor, Simeon C.
    Chigor, Vincent N.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (01)
  • [8] Phthalates, nonylphenols and LAS in an alternately operated wastewater treatment plant - fate modelling based on measured concentrations in wastewater and sludge
    Fauser, P
    Vikelsoe, J
    Sorensen, PB
    Carlsen, L
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (06) : 1288 - 1295
  • [9] Quantification of estrogen concentration in a creek receiving wastewater treatment plant effluent
    Adeyeye, Adebayo O.
    Laub, Brian G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 192 (07)
  • [10] Quantification of estrogen concentration in a creek receiving wastewater treatment plant effluent
    Adebayo O. Adeyeye
    Brian G. Laub
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2020, 192