The Go/No-go Association Task

被引:761
|
作者
Nosek, BA [1 ]
Banaji, MR [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
development of techniques for measurement is critical to the successful development of theory. This paper presents a technique - the Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT) - that joins a family of existing techniques for measuring implicit social cognition generally, with a focus on attitude (evaluation). To expand the measurement potential supplied by its closest cousin, the Implicit Association Test (IAT), the GNAT can be used to examine automatic social cognition toward a single target category. That is, the GNAT obtains a measure of implicit social cognition without requiring the direct involvement of complementary or contrasting objects. Also, by implementing a response deadline in the procedure, this version of the GNAT trades off response latency for sensitivity as the dependent variable measure. We illustrate the technique through a series of experiments (1-5) using simple attitude objects (bugs and fruit). In Experiment 6, the GNAT is used to investigate attitudes toward race (black and white) and gender (male and female). To explore the theoretical leverage offered by this tool, Experiment 6 puts to test a recurring question concerning automatic in-group favoritism versus out-group derogation. Results demonstrate the dual presence of both out-group derogation (e.g., negativity toward black Americans) and in-group favoritism (positivity toward white Americans), a finding that emerges because the GNAT offers the potential for separable measures of attitude toward the two groups. Through these experiments, the GNAT is shown to be an effective tool for assessing automatic preferences as well as resolving persistent questions that require measures of individual attitude objects while maintaining the advantages of response competition tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 666
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A portable version of the go/no-go association task (GNAT)
    Bassett, JF
    Dabbs, JM
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2005, 37 (03) : 506 - 512
  • [2] A portable version of the go/no-go association task (GNAT)
    Jonathan F. Bassett
    James M. Dabbs
    [J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2005, 37 : 506 - 512
  • [3] Brain activities during Go/No-Go Association Task
    Hioki, K
    Matsuoka, K
    Watanabe, H
    Umemura, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 204 - 204
  • [4] A model of the Go/No-Go task
    Gomez, Pablo
    Perea, Manuel
    Ratcliff, Roger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2007, 136 (03) : 389 - 413
  • [5] Go or no-go? An assessment of inhibitory control training using the GO/NO-GO task in adolescents
    van Royen, Annelies
    van Malderen, Eva
    Desmeta, Maurane
    Goossens, Lien
    Verbeken, Sandra
    Kemps, Eva
    [J]. APPETITE, 2022, 179
  • [6] Grading odor similarities in a Go/No-Go task
    Kay, Leslie M.
    Krysiak, Magdalena
    Barlas, Lale
    Bloom Edgerton, Gabrielle
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 88 (4-5) : 339 - 346
  • [7] The many-facet Rasch model in the analysis of the go/no-go association task
    Vianello, Michelangelo
    Robusto, Egidio
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2010, 42 (04) : 944 - 956
  • [8] The many-facet Rasch model in the analysis of the go/no-go association task
    Michelangelo Vianello
    Egidio Robusto
    [J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2010, 42 : 944 - 956
  • [9] Evaluating implicit spider fear associations using the Go/No-go Association Task
    Teachman, Bethany A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 38 (02) : 156 - 167
  • [10] Valuation of Go Stimuli or Devaluation of No-Go Stimuli? Evidence of an Increased Preference for Attended Go Stimuli Following a Go/No-Go Task
    Inoue, Kazuya
    Sato, Nobuya
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8