Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option as a bridge to heart transplant

被引:7
|
作者
Carter, Kristen T. [1 ]
O'Brien, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Larson, Sharon B. [3 ]
Creswell, Lawrence L. [4 ]
Kutcher, Matthew [1 ]
Baran, David A. [5 ]
Copeland, Jack G. [6 ]
Copeland, Hannah [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Dept Data Sci, Med Ctr, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Dept Surg, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Mississippi, Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Med Ctr, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[5] Sentara Heart Hosp, Norfolk, VA USA
[6] Univ Arizona, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Tucson, AZ USA
来源
关键词
bridge-to-transplant; donor organ allocation system; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; heart transplant; shock; UNITED-STATES; SUPPORT; OUTCOMES; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a rescue therapy for patients in cardiogenic shock. We hypothesize that patients bridged to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have decreased survival. Methods: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 1999, to March 31, 2018, for heart transplant recipients. Recipients bridged with any form of mechanical support and those without support were compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The primary end point was restricted mean survival time through 16.7 years. Results: Of 26,918 recipients, 15,076 required no pretransplant mechanical support (56.0%). Support patients included 9321 with left ventricular assist devices (34.6%), 53 with right ventricular assist devices (0.2%), 258 with total artificial hearts (1.0%), 686 with biventricular assist devices (2.6%), 1378 with intra-aortic balloon pumps (5.1%), and 146 who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.5%). In the first 16.7 years post-transplant, compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, estimated adjusted restricted mean survival time was higher in patients who required no mechanical support (16.6 months [14.0-19.4]) and patients with a left ventricular assist device (16.5 months [99% confidence interval, 13.9-19.2]), an intra-aortic balloon pump (11.2 months [8.3-14.7]), or a biventricular assist device (6.6 months [3.6-10.3]). Restricted mean survival time in patients with a right ventricular assist device or a total artificial heart was similar to patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Conclusions: Recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were estimated to survive 16.6 months less than nonmechanical circulatory support recipients. Bridge to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option, and these patients should be considered transplant candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Direct Bridge to Heart Transplant
    Sahbaz, J.
    Kastner, E. P.
    Kon, Z. N.
    Feller, F. D.
    Ton, V.
    Pham, S. M.
    Sorensen, E. N.
    Ramani, G. V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S428 - S429
  • [2] Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Heart Transplant-An Inflamed Bridge?
    Mehmood, Muddassir
    [J]. JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (03) : 362 - 362
  • [3] Ambulating femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to heart-lung transplant
    Shudo, Yasuhiro
    Kasinpila, Patpilai
    Lee, Anson M.
    Rao, Vidya K.
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 156 (03): : E135 - E137
  • [4] Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support as a Bridge to Heart Transplant: Report of 3 Cases
    Gedik, Ender
    Ulas, Aydin
    Ersoy, Ozgur
    Atar, Funda
    Firat, Aynur Camkiran
    Pirat, Arash
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 14 : 121 - 124
  • [5] Perioperative Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support During Heart Transplant
    Gedik, Ender
    Atar, Funda
    Ozdemirkan, Aycan
    Firat, Aynur Camkiran
    Zeyneloglu, Pinar
    Sezgin, Atilla
    Pirat, Arash
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 15 : 224 - 230
  • [6] Prolonged Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support as a Bridge to Heart Transplant
    Sert, Dogan Emre
    Kervan, Umit
    Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit
    Karahan, Mehmet
    San, Ishak
    Bekgoz, Burak
    Ozatik, Ali
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 20 (04) : 436 - 439
  • [7] Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a viable option?
    Meuwese, C. L.
    Ramjankhan, F. Z.
    Kraaijeveld, A. O.
    Donker, D. W.
    [J]. NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (03) : 136 - 138
  • [8] Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a viable option?
    C. L. Meuwese
    F. Z. Ramjankhan
    A. O. Kraaijeveld
    D. W. Donker
    [J]. Netherlands Heart Journal, 2020, 28 : 136 - 138
  • [9] Is venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation an option for managing septic shock
    Helwani, Mohammad A.
    Lim, Aaron
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 36 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [10] Single Center Experience with Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Bridge to Heart Transplant under the Contemporary UNOS Heart Allocation System
    Jeng, E.
    Esseghir, F.
    Ahmed, M.
    Parker, A.
    Al-Ani, M.
    Vilaro, J.
    Aranda, J.
    Peek, G.
    Bleiweis, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S290 - S290