Minimally invasive management of paraesophageal herniation in the high-risk surgical patient

被引:32
|
作者
Kercher, KW
Matthews, BD
Ponsky, JL
Goldstein, SL
Yavorski, RT
Sing, RF
Heniford, BT
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[2] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2001年 / 182卷 / 05期
关键词
paraesophageal hernia; minimally invasive surgery; endoscopy; percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00760-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditional management of symptomatic paraesophageal herniation involves hernia reduction, hiatal closure, and an antireflux procedure or gastropexy. Patients with significant comorbidities may not tolerate operative repair. A new technique, laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic reduction and fixation of the stomach, may provide a minimally invasive treatment alternative. Methods: Eleven elderly patients with symptomatic paraesophageal herniation were managed with flexible endoscopy and double percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion with or without laparoscopic assistance. Results: All patients presented with a symptomatic paraesophageal hernia. Mean age was 78.3 years (range 72 to 84). Each wa's deemed at high risk for definitive repair due to preexisting coronary artery disease as well as at least two other serious comorbidities. Hernia reduction and intra-abdominal fixation of the stomach was achieved in each case using flexible endoscopy and double PEG insertion. Laparoscopic assistance for reduction and gastropexy was utilized in 9 cases. Mean operative time was 61 minutes (range 28 to 104). Average length of stay was 2.8 days (range 0 to 12). One minor and three major postoperative complications occurred. Over a mean follow-up of 4.1 months (range 2 to 7), all patients have resumed oral intake and achieved weight gain. Conclusions: Patients with symptomatic paraesophageal herniation require intervention to alleviate symptoms and avoid the complications of gastric incarceration. For the high-risk patient, endoscopic reduction and PEG with laparoscopic assistance appears to provide effective treatment. (C) 2001 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 514
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive resection of papillary fibroelastoma in a high-risk patient
    Kim, Richard W.
    Jeffery, Maren E.
    Smith, Maximilian J.
    Wilensky, Robert L.
    Woo, Edward Y.
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (08) : 639 - 641
  • [2] The high-risk surgical patient and the role of preoperative management
    Girbes, ARJ
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 57 (03): : 98 - 105
  • [3] Innovative minimally invasive surgical approaches to coronary revascularization in the high risk patient
    Cohn, W
    Weintraub, R
    Sellke, F
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2000, 3 (03): : 185 - 188
  • [4] Minimally invasive valve surgery in high-risk patients
    Santana, Orlando
    Xydas, Steve
    Williams, Roy F.
    Wittels, S. Howard
    Yucel, Evin
    Mihos, Christos G.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 : S614 - S623
  • [5] Clinical review: How is risk defined in high-risk surgical patient management?
    Boyd, O
    Jackson, N
    CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 9 (04): : 390 - 396
  • [6] Clinical review: How is risk defined in high-risk surgical patient management?
    Owen Boyd
    Neil Jackson
    Critical Care, 9
  • [7] MANAGEMENT OF THE HIGH-RISK PATIENT
    SCLAFANI, L
    SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 7 (05): : 261 - 266
  • [8] Management of the high-risk patient
    Vogel, VG
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 83 (04) : 733 - +
  • [9] The high-risk surgical patient revisited
    David Bennett
    Critical Care, 2 (1):
  • [10] Who is a high-risk surgical patient?
    Bose, Somnath
    Talmor, Daniel
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 24 (06) : 547 - 553