The euro-area government spending multiplier at the effective lower bound

被引:22
|
作者
Amendola, Adalgiso [1 ,3 ]
Di Serio, Mario [1 ]
Fragetta, Matteo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Melina, Giovanni [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Econ & Stat, Via Ponte Don Melillo, I-84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy
[2] Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, Business Res Unit BRU IUL, Ava Forcas Armadas, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Salerno, CELPE, Ctr Econ Lavoro & Polit Econ, Salerno, Italy
[4] Int Monetary Fund, Res Dept, 700 19th St NW, Washington, DC 20431 USA
[5] Ctr Econ Studies, CESifo, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[6] Ifo Inst, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
关键词
Fiscal multiplier; Zero lower bound; Panel VAR; Factor models; Euro area; FISCAL FORESIGHT; MONETARY-POLICY; TIME-SERIES; INFORMATION; RESPONSES; SHOCKS; IMPACT; NEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103480
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We build a factor-augmented interacted panel vector-autoregressive model of the Euro Area (EA) and estimate it with Bayesian methods to compute government spending multipliers. The multipliers are contingent on the overall monetary policy stance, captured by a shadow monetary policy rate. Whether the fiscal shock occurs when the economy is at the effective lower bound (ELB) or in normal times matters for the size of the multiplier. Median estimates vary conditional on the specification, but the difference between multipliers at the ELB and in normal times is systematically positive with very high probability. Over the medium run (5 years), median cumulated multipliers range between 0.3 and 1.4 in normal times, and between 1.6 and 2.9 at the ELB. We show that the results are not driven by the state of the business cycle and that the multiplier is inversely correlated with the level of the shadow monetary policy rate. The econometric approach deals with several technical problems highlighted in the empirical macroeconomic literature, including the issues of fiscal foresight and limited information. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the size of the government spending multiplier in the euro area
    Feve, Patrick
    Sahuc, Jean-Guillaume
    [J]. OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2015, 67 (03): : 531 - 552
  • [2] The spending multiplier in a time of massive public debt: The Euro-area case
    Vranceanu, Radu
    Besancenot, Damien
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 20 (08) : 758 - 762
  • [3] The impact of r-g on Euro-Area government spending multipliers
    Di Serio, Mario
    Fragetta, Matteo
    Melina, Giovanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2021, 119
  • [4] The composition of government spending and the multiplier at the zero lower bound
    Albertini, Julien
    Poirier, Arthur
    Roulleau-Pasdeloup, Jordan
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 122 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [5] HOW CAN THE GOVERNMENT SPENDING MULTIPLIER BE SMALL AT THE ZERO LOWER BOUND?
    Ercolani, Valerio
    Valle E Azevedo, Joao
    [J]. MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2019, 23 (08) : 3457 - 3482
  • [6] The Euro Area Government Spending Multiplier in Demand- and Supply-Driven Recessions
    Di Serio, Mario
    Fragetta, Matteo
    Gasteiger, Emanuel
    Melina, Giovanni
    [J]. OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2024,
  • [7] The Government Spending Multiplier at the Zero Lower Bound: Evidence from the United States*
    di Serio, Mario
    Fragetta, Matteo
    Gasteiger, Emanuel
    [J]. OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2021, 82 (06) : 1262 - 1294
  • [8] The government spending multiplier at the zero lower bound: International evidence from historical data
    Klein, Mathias
    Winkler, Roland
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 36 (06) : 744 - 759
  • [9] Government investment fiscal multipliers: evidence from Euro-area countries
    Deleidi, Matteo
    Iafrate, Francesca
    Levrero, Enrico Sergio
    [J]. MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2023, 27 (02) : 331 - 349
  • [10] Keynesian government spending multipliers and spillovers in the euro area
    Cwik, Tobias
    Wieland, Volker
    [J]. ECONOMIC POLICY, 2011, (67) : 493 - 549