Alkalinized lidocaine solution as a first-line local anesthesia protocol for intradetrusor injection of onabotulinum toxin A: Results from a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

被引:15
|
作者
Pereira e Silva, Ricardo [1 ,2 ]
Ponte, Carolina [1 ]
Lopes, Filipe [1 ]
Palma dos Reis, Jose [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Lisboa Norte, Dept Urol, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Med, Clin Univ Urol, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
administration; intravesical; anesthesia; local; urinary bladder; overactive; botulinum toxins; type A; double-blind method; lidocaine; randomized controlled trial; sodium bicarbonate; INTRAVESICAL BOTULINUM-TOXIN; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; PAIN INTENSITY; BLADDER; EFFICACY; SYMPTOMS; PHASE-3; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/nau.24519
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Local anesthesia protocols for intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A (BoNTA) injection lack standardization. We aimed to determine if an alkalinized lidocaine solution is more effective than lidocaine only. Methods Patients of both genders aged 18 or above enlisted for intradetrusor BoNTA injection (idiopathic, neurogenic, and bladder pain syndrome) were included in a double-blinded randomized controlled trial after obtaining their informed consent. All participants filled a bladder diary and a urine culture was performed. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to Protocol A (20 ml 2% lidocaine + 10 ml 8.4% sodium bicarbonate) or Protocol B (20 ml 2% lidocaine + 10 ml 0.9% saline solution). A Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) was used to assess the level of pain immediately after the procedure (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included pain after 1 h, urinary tract infection, acute urinary retention, and hematuria related to the procedure. Results A total of 116 patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, indication, and bladder diary parameters) of patients in Group A and B were similar. Pain scores at the end of the procedure were significantly lower with the alkalinized solution (Protocol A and B, respectively, 2.37 +/- 0.31 vs. 4.44 +/- 0.36,p < .01). No differences were observed 1 h after treatment (Protocol A and B, respectively, 0.54 +/- 0.17 vs. 0.69 +/- 0.19,p = .487). The only adverse event reported was mild-to-moderate self-limited hematuria in 15.4% of patients. Conclusions The use of an alkalinized lidocaine solution has proven to be significantly superior to lidocaine only as local anesthesia before intradetrusor BoNTA injection, suggesting that this may be considered a first-line option.
引用
收藏
页码:2471 / 2479
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Gastrocnemius Hypertrophy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Controlled Trial
    Han, Woo Yeon
    Lee, Young Soon
    Han, Hyun Ho
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [2] Comparison Between Corticosteroid and Lidocaine Injection in the Treatment of Tennis Elbow: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial
    Hsieh, Lin-Fen
    Kuo, Ying-Chen
    Lee, Chia-Cheng
    Liu, Ya-Fang
    Liu, Yu-Chia
    Huang, Vincent
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2018, 97 (02) : 83 - 89
  • [3] Comparison Between Corticosteroid and Lidocaine Injection in the Treatment of Tennis Elbow: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial
    Hsieh, Lin-Fen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2018, 97 (09) : E86 - E86
  • [4] Efficacy of a single botulinum toxin A injection for distal tarsal tunnel syndrome: A protocol for a randomized, double-blinded trial
    Baarini, Omar
    Tan, Beng J.
    Edwards, Steven R.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 21
  • [5] Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
    Safavi, Mohammadreza
    Honarmand, Azim
    Sahaf, Ashraf Sadat
    Sahaf, Seyyed Mohammad
    Attari, Mohammadali
    Payandeh, Mahsa
    Iazdani, Alireza
    Norian, Nilofarsaddat
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2015, 4 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [6] Botulinum Toxin to Improve Results in Cleft Lip Repair: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Chang, Chun-Shin
    Wallace, Christopher Glenn
    Hsiao, Yen-Chang
    Chang, Chee-Jen
    Chen, Philip Kuo-Ting
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [7] Letter to the Editor Involving the Article "Comparison Between Corticosteroids and Lidocaine Injection in the Treatment of Tennis Elbow: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial"
    van Schie, Peter
    Benders, Kim Eva Maria
    van den Bekerom, Michel Pieter Jozef
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2018, 97 (09) : E85 - E86
  • [8] Clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A injection for reducing scars in patients with forehead laceration A double-blinded, randomized controlled study
    Kim, Seong Hwan
    Lee, Seong Joo
    Lee, Jun Won
    Jeong, Hii Sun
    Suh, In Suck
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (34)
  • [9] Umbilical cord mesenchyme stem cell local intramuscular injection for treatment of uterine niche: Protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Fan, Dazhi
    Wu, Shuzhen
    Ye, Shaoxin
    Wang, Wen
    Guo, Xiaoling
    Liu, Zhengping
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (44)
  • [10] Dexmedetomidine vs. lidocaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy: a protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
    Zhang, Yuan
    Bao, Di
    Chi, Dongmei
    Li, Lu
    Liu, Bin
    Zhang, Di
    Qiao, Lanxin
    Liang, Yi
    Wang, Yaxin
    Jin, Xu
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)