The side effects of morphine and hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia

被引:99
|
作者
Hong, Daewha [1 ]
Flood, Pamela [1 ]
Diaz, Geraldine [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2008年 / 107卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1213/ane.0b013e3181823efb
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Despite "clinical lore" among health care providers that treatment with hydromorphone results in improved pain control and fewer adverse side effects, morphine Continues to be the first-line medication for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). In this study, we compared the efficacy and side-effect profiles of morphine and hydromorphone at concentrations producing equivalent drug effect measured by p m score and miosis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of 50 general and gynecological surgery patients. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either morphine (1 mg/mL) or hydromorphone (0.2 mg/mL) via PCA after surgery and were followed for a period of 8 h. The primary outcome was nausea. Secondary outcome variables were pruritus, vomiting, sedation, pain report, pupillary miosis, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The side effect profile was not different between drugs. The incidence of nausea did not differ between morphine and hydromorphone-treated patients (1 h: 44% vs 52%., 8 h: 68% vs 64%), vomiting (1 h: 4% vs 0%., 8 h: 0% vs 4%), or pruritus (1 h: 4% vs 16%, 8 h: 40% vs 40%). There was no difference in the amount of medication required to treat side effects or patient satisfaction. The average ratio of morphine to hydromorphone use was about 7:1. The patients used 10.9 +/- 6.0 mg morphine versus 1.57 +/- 1.0 mg hydromorphone after 1 h and 29.0 +/- 18.0 mg morphine versus 3.9 +/- 2.5 mg hydromorphone after 8 h. There was no difference between the morphine and hydromorphone groups With respect to postoperative pain scores with movement at 1 h (7.9 +/- 2.3 vs 7.1 +/- 2.4) or 8 h (5.7 +/- 2.8 vs 5.9 +/- 2.7). There was also no difference in pain at rest or miosis between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no systematic difference between morphine and hydromorphone in opioid-related side effects. Neither was there any difference in efficacy of pain control or patient satisfaction when patients self-titrated to equal drug effect as measured by equianalgesia and pupillary miosis. The choice between morphine and hydromorphone for use in PCA should be guided by patient history, as there may be idiosyncratic reactions to either drug.
引用
收藏
页码:1384 / 1389
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multidimensional comparison of morphine and hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia
    Rapp, SE
    Egan, KJ
    Ross, BK
    Wild, LM
    Terman, GW
    Ching, JM
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (05): : 1043 - 1048
  • [2] Patient-controlled analgesia in the pediatric population: morphine versus hydromorphone
    DiGiusto, Matthew
    Bhalla, Tarun
    Martin, David
    Foerschler, Derek
    Jones, Megan J.
    Tobias, Joseph D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2014, 7 : 471 - 475
  • [3] Controlled Trial of Morphine vs Hydromorphone for Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Children with Postoperative Pain
    Karl, Helen W.
    Tyler, Donald C.
    Miser, Angela W.
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2012, 13 (12) : 1658 - 1659
  • [4] Is postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with hydromorphone better than epidural morphine?
    Gan, TJ
    Ginsberg, B
    Perno, R
    Dentz, M
    Jhaveri, R
    Glas, PSA
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 : S293 - S293
  • [5] Morphine patient-controlled analgesia is superior to meperidine patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain
    Plummer, JL
    Owen, H
    Ilsley, AH
    Inglis, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (04): : 794 - 799
  • [6] Effects of Epidural Naloxone on Pruritus Induced by Hydromorphone Epidural Patient-Controlled Analgesia
    Bang, Si Ra
    Kim, Hee Suk
    Kim, Ji Hyeok
    Sim, Woo Seok
    Gwak, Mi Sook
    Yang, Mi Kyung
    Kim, Chung Su
    Hahm, Tae Soo
    Cho, Hyun Sung
    Choi, Duck Hwan
    Kim, Tae Hyeong
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 19 (01): : 91 - 95
  • [7] FENTANYL VERSUS MORPHINE FOR PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA
    WATT, JWG
    SOULSBY, NR
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (05) : 470 - 471
  • [8] PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH EXTRADURAL MORPHINE OR PETHIDINE
    SJOSTROM, S
    HARTVIG, D
    TAMSEN, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 60 (04) : 358 - 366
  • [9] PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH A MIXTURE OF MORPHINE AND DROPERIDOL
    SHARMA, SK
    DAVIES, MW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (03) : 435 - 436
  • [10] NALBUPHINE IN PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA - A COMPARISON WITH MORPHINE
    CHRISTIANSEN, S
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1987, 41 (06): : 933 - 945