How should patients behave to facilitate shared decision making - the doctors' view

被引:37
|
作者
Hamann, Johannes [1 ]
Mendel, Rosmarie [1 ]
Buehner, Markus [2 ]
Kissling, Werner [1 ]
Cohen, Rudolf [1 ]
Knipfer, Eva [3 ]
Eckstein, Hans-Henning [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klin & Poliklin Psychiat & Psychotherapie, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Psychol, Graz, Austria
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Klin Gefasschirurg, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
doctor-patient communication; patient autonomy; shared decision making; PRESTIGE HIERARCHY; COMMUNICATION; PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIANS; LEAST; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00682.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To study how physicians feel about patients efforts to be engaged in shared decision making (SDM). Study setting and design Survey of physicians from distinctly different medical disciplines (238 psychiatrists and 169 vascular surgeons). Participants were requested to judge which patient behaviours they find helpful and which behaviours detrimental for SDM. Results Psychiatrists and surgeons had rather positive attitudes about active patient behaviours. However, there were quite a few patient behaviours (e.g. searching the Internet, being assertive towards the doctor) which provoked ambivalent or negative attitudes. Discussion and conclusions Physicians are generally quite open towards active patient behaviour in the consultation. They, however, do consider it as less helpful and become more annoyed if patients insist on their preferences and doubt their doctors recommendations. Physicians must realize that SDM implies giving up decisional power and try to be more flexible in their interactions with patients.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 366
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shared decision making: a personal view from two kidney doctors and a patient
    Hole, Barnaby
    Scanlon, Miranda
    Tomson, Charlie
    CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2023, 16 : i12 - i19
  • [2] Shared decision making: doctors have expertise that patients want or need
    Dingwall, Robert
    Pilnick, Alison
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
  • [3] Shared Decision Making: An Alternative View
    Schattner, Ami
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 89 (02) : 276 - 276
  • [4] On defensive decision making: how doctors make decisions for their patients
    Garcia-Retamero, Rocio
    Galesic, Mirta
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (05) : 664 - 669
  • [5] Antipsychotic choice: understanding shared decision-making among doctors and patients
    Yeo, Vivien
    Dowsey, Michelle
    Alguera-Lara, Victoria
    Ride, Jemimah
    Lancsar, Emily
    Castle, David J.
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 30 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [6] Do Patients Want Shared Decision Making and How Is This Measured?
    Haerter, Martin
    Simon, Daniela
    BETTER DOCTORS, BETTER PATIENTS, BETTER DECISIONS: ENVISIONING HEALTH CARE 2020, 2011, : 53 - 58
  • [7] DO DECISION AIDS FACILITATE SHARED DECISION MAKING CONVERSATIONS IN UROGYNECOLOGY?
    Marques, Felisha
    Josloff, Kevan
    Hung, Kristin
    Wakamatsu, May
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E52 - E53
  • [8] Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice
    Barry, MJ
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (02) : 127 - 135
  • [9] How shared is shared decision-making? A care-ethical view on the role of partner and family
    van Nistelrooij, Inge
    Visse, Merel
    Spekkink, Ankana
    de lange, Jasmijn
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 43 (09) : 637 - 644
  • [10] Shared decision making: The psychologists point of view
    Fallowfield, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S111 - S111