Identifying QAnon Conspiracy Theory Adherent Types

被引:1
|
作者
Westmark, Colton R. [1 ]
McMahon, Adam M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rider Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 USA
[2] Coll New Jersey, Dept Polit Sci, Ewing, NJ USA
关键词
QAnon; conspiracy theories; insurrection; deep state; January; 6th; SELECTIVE EXPOSURE; BELIEF;
D O I
10.1080/07393148.2022.2129927
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Since the 2016 election of President Donald Trump, conspiracy theories have become more salient among Americans. Using the deep state conspiracy theory QAnon as a case study, we argue three types of conspiracy theory adherents exist due to cognitive dissonance experienced in the face of key theory milestone failures: Hardliners, who do not face cognitive dissonance in response to failed conspiracy theory predictions; Moderates, committed members who experience cognitive dissonance and must adapt in order to maintain belief in the conspiracy theory, and Bandwagoners, casual members with shallow beliefs who experience cognitive dissonance and abandon the conspiracy theory. From these types, we put forth the bandwagoner acceleration hypothesis: by emphasizing the disconnect between complex deep state conspiracy theory beliefs and reality that demonstrates the falsehoods perpetrated by the movement, relevant stakeholders exogenous to the conspiracy theory can activate Bandwagoners to stimulate conspiratorial belief abandonment. This is important as Bandwagoners represent the peril of latent power which can be coopted and used to threaten democratic legitimacy.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 627
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条