Measurement of single low-density lipoprotein particles by atomic force microscopy

被引:12
|
作者
Sakurai, Toshihiro [1 ]
Takeda, Seiji [1 ]
Takahashi, Jun-ya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Takahashi, Yuji [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wada, Norio
Trirongjitmoah, Suchin [4 ]
Namita, Takeshi [4 ]
Jin, Shigeki [1 ]
Ikuta, Akiko [1 ]
Furumaki, Hiroaki [1 ]
Hui, Shu-Ping [1 ]
Fuda, Hirotoshi [1 ]
Fujikawa, Masato [2 ,3 ]
Shimizu, Koichi [4 ]
Chiba, Hitoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600812, Japan
[2] Sapporo City Gen Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Sapporo City Gen Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Informat Sci & Technol, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600812, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
AFM; small dense LDL; large LDL; electron microscopy; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-SPECTROSCOPY; LDL CHOLESTEROL; IN-SITU; SIZE; DISEASE; RISK; DISTRIBUTIONS; SUBCLASSES; STIFFNESS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1177/0004563213481586
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background The size of lipoprotein particles is relevant to the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods We investigated the feasibility of atomic force microscopy (AFM) for evaluating the size of large low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and small dense LDL (sd-LDL) separated by ultracentrifugation. The measurements by AFM in tapping mode were compared to those by electron microscopy (EM). Results There was a significant difference in particle sizes determined by AFM between large LDL (20.61.9nm, mean +/- SD) and sd-LDL (16.2 +/- 1.4nm) obtained from six healthy volunteers (P<0.05). The particle sizes determined by EM for the same samples were 23.2 +/- 1.4nm for large LDL and 20.4 +/- 1.4nm for sd-LDL. The difference between large LDL and sd-LDL detected by EM was also statistically significant (P<0.05). In addition, the particle sizes of each lipoprotein fraction were significantly different between AFM and EM: P<0.05 for large LDL and P<0.05 for sd-LDL. Conclusions AFM can differentiate between sd-LDL and large LDL particles by their size, and might be useful for evaluating risk for CAD.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 570
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement of small dense low-density lipoprotein particles
    Hirano, T
    Ito, Y
    Yoshino, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 2005, 12 (02) : 67 - 72
  • [2] Application of Kelvin force microscopy for evaluation of oxidized low-density lipoprotein
    Takeda, Seiji
    Ohkawa, Futaba
    Sakurai, Toshihiro
    Jin, Shigeki
    Fuda, Hirotoshi
    Hui, Shu-Ping
    Chiba, Hitoshi
    Sueoka, Kazuhisa
    [J]. 2012 IEEE SENSORS PROCEEDINGS, 2012, : 1751 - 1754
  • [3] Low-density lipoprotein particles in atherosclerosis
    Qiao, Ya-Nan
    Zou, Yan-Li
    Guo, Shou-Dong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [4] EFFECT OF EVOLOCUMAB ON LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLES
    Toth, Peter P.
    Banach, Maciej
    Djedjos, Constantine
    Yang, Xiaoyun
    Elliott, Mary
    Davis, Mike
    Somaratne, Ransi
    Martin, Seth
    Jones, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 1909 - 1909
  • [5] MEASUREMENT OF RECEPTOR-INDEPENDENT METABOLISM OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN - AN APPLICATION OF GLYCOSYLATED LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN
    SASAKI, J
    OKAMURA, T
    COTTAM, GL
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1983, 131 (03): : 535 - 538
  • [6] MEASUREMENT OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL IN MILLIMOLES
    SHESTOV, DB
    [J]. LABORATORNOE DELO, 1985, (06): : 381 - 381
  • [7] Managing to low-density lipoprotein particles compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Rizzo, John A.
    Mallow, Peter J.
    Waters, Heidi C.
    Pokrywka, Gregory S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2013, 7 (06) : 642 - 652
  • [8] COMPARISON OF GLUCOSYLATED LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN WITH METHYLATED OR CYCLOHEXANEDIONE-TREATED LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN IN THE MEASUREMENT OF RECEPTOR-INDEPENDENT LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CATABOLISM
    STEINBRECHER, UP
    WITZTUM, JL
    KESANIEMI, YA
    ELAM, R
    [J]. ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, 1982, 2 (05): : A444 - A444
  • [9] COMPARISON OF GLUCOSYLATED LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN WITH METHYLATED OR CYCLOHEXANEDIONE-TREATED LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN IN THE MEASUREMENT OF RECEPTOR-INDEPENDENT LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CATABOLISM
    STEINBRECHER, UP
    WITZTUM, JL
    KESANIEMI, YA
    ELAM, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1983, 71 (04): : 960 - 964
  • [10] All Low-Density Lipoprotein Particles Are Not Created Equal
    Krauss, Ronald M.
    [J]. ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2014, 34 (05) : 959 - 961