Approximately Optimal Solutions to the Finite-Dimensional Witsenhausen Counterexample

被引:17
|
作者
Grover, Pulkit [1 ]
Park, Se Yong [2 ]
Sahai, Anant [2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Decentralized control; implicit communication; information theory; linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) systems; INFORMATION; CAPACITY; RATES; TEAMS;
D O I
10.1109/TAC.2013.2257595
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recently, a vector version of Witsenhausen's counterexample was considered and it was shown that in the asymptotic limit of infinite vector length, certain vector-quantization-based control strategies are provably within a constant factor of the asymptotically optimal cost for all possible problem parameters. While suggestive, a constant factor result for the finite-dimensional problem has remained elusive. In this paper, we provide a resolution to this issue. By applying a large-deviation "sphere-packing" philosophy, we derive a lower bound to the optimal cost for the finite dimensional case that uses appropriate shadows of an existing vector lower bound that is the same for all dimensions. Using this new lower bound, we show that good lattice-quantization-based control strategies achieve within a constant factor of the optimal cost uniformly over all possible problem parameters, including the vector length. For Witsenhausen's original problem-which is the scalar case-the gap between regular lattice-quantization-based strategies and the lower bound is provably never more than a factor of 100, and computer calculations strongly suggest that the factor in fact may be no larger than 8. Finally, to obtain a numerical understanding of the possible room for improvement in costs using alternative strategies, we also include numerical comparison with strategies that are conjectured to be optimal. Using this comparison, we posit that there is more room for improvement in our lower bounds than in our upper bounds.
引用
收藏
页码:2189 / 2204
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The finite-dimensional Witsenhausen counterexample
    Grover, Pulkit
    Sahai, Anant
    Park, Se Yong
    [J]. 2009 7TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION IN MOBILE, AD HOC, AND WIRELESS, 2009, : 604 - 613
  • [2] A constant-factor approximately optimal solution to the Witsenhausen Counterexample
    Park, Se Yong
    Grover, Pulkit
    Sahai, Anant
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2009 HELD JOINTLY WITH THE 2009 28TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CDC/CCC 2009), 2009, : 2881 - 2886
  • [3] APPROXIMATELY FINITE-DIMENSIONAL BANACH-SPACES
    MOORE, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS, 1981, 42 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [4] APPROXIMATELY FINITE-DIMENSIONAL VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS
    ELLIOTT, GA
    [J]. MATHEMATICA SCANDINAVICA, 1976, 39 (01) : 91 - 101
  • [5] Linear controllers are uniformly optimal for the Witsenhausen counterexample
    Rotkowitz, Michael
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2006, : 553 - 558
  • [6] Numerical solutions to the Witsenhausen counterexample by approximating networks
    Baglietto, M
    Parisini, T
    Zoppoli, R
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2001, 46 (09) : 1471 - 1477
  • [7] Continuous Random Variable Estimation is not Optimal for the Witsenhausen Counterexample
    Le Treust, Mael
    Oechtering, Tobias J.
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY (ISIT), 2021, : 1889 - 1894
  • [8] On the C*-envelope of approximately finite-dimensional operator algebras
    Laurie, C
    Power, SC
    [J]. MATHEMATICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 80 (01) : 107 - 124
  • [9] Approximately controllable finite-dimensional bilinear systems are controllable
    Cannarsa, Daniele
    Sigalotti, Mario
    [J]. SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 2021, 157
  • [10] Slopey Quantizers Are Locally Optimal for Witsenhausen's Counterexample
    Ajorlou, Amir
    Jadbabaie, Ali
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 55TH CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2016, : 3566 - 3571