Performance assessment of a Bayesian Forecasting System (BFS) for real-time flood forecasting

The paper evaluates, for a number of flood events, the performance of a Bayesian Forecasting System (BFS), with the aim of evaluating total uncertainty in real-time flood forecasting. The predictive uncertainty of future streamflow is estimated through the Bayesian integration of two separate processors. The former evaluates the propagation of input uncertainty on simulated river discharge, the latter computes the hydrological uncertainty of actual river discharge associated with all other possible sources of error. A stochastic model and a distributed rainfall-runoff model were assumed, respectively, for rainfall and hydrological response simulations. A case study was carried out for a small basin in the Calabria region (southern Italy). The performance assessment of the BFS was performed with adequate verification tools suited for probabilistic forecasts of continuous variables such as streamflow. Graphical tools and scalar metrics were used to evaluate several attributes of the forecast quality of the entire time-varying predictive distributions: calibration, sharpness, accuracy, and continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). Besides the overall system, which incorporates both sources of uncertainty, other hypotheses resulting from the BFS properties were examined, corresponding to (i) a perfect hydrological model; (ii) a non-informative rainfall forecast for predicting streamflow; and (iii) a perfect input forecast. The results emphasize the importance of using different diagnostic approaches to perform comprehensive analyses of predictive distributions, to arrive at a multifaceted view of the attributes of the prediction. For the case study, the selected criteria revealed the interaction of the different sources of error, in particular the crucial role of the hydrological uncertainty processor when compensating, at the cost of wider forecast intervals, for the unreliable and biased predictive distribution resulting from the Precipitation Uncertainty Processor. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.