Pricing TARNs Using a Finite Difference Method

被引:2
|
作者
Luo, Xiaolin [1 ]
Shevchenko, Pavel V. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Div Math Informat & Stat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF DERIVATIVES | 2015年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
VALUATION;
D O I
10.3905/jod.2015.23.1.062
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Target accumulation redemption notes (TARNs) have become very popular products among Asian foreign exchange investors due to their flexibility to be structured to suit any foreign exchange outlook. TARN payoff is path dependent, and typically practitioners use the Monte Carlo method to evaluate TARN prices. This article describes a finite difference scheme for pricing a TARN option. Key steps in the proposed scheme involve tracking multiple one-dimensional finite difference solutions, applying jump conditions at each cash flow exchange date, and a cubic spline interpolation of results after each jump. Since a finite difference scheme for TARNs has significantly different features from a typical finite difference scheme for options with a path-independent payoff, we give a step-by-step description on the implementation of the scheme, which is not available in the literature. The advantages of the proposed finite difference scheme over the Monte Carlo method are illustrated by examples using three different knockout types. In the case of constant or time-dependent volatility models (where Monte Carlo requires simulation at cash flow dates only), the finite difference method can be faster than the Monte Carlo method by an order of magnitude while achieving the same accuracy in price. The finite difference method can be even more efficient in the case of a local volatility model because the Monte Carlo method requires a significantly larger number of time steps. In terms of robust and accurate estimation of Greeks, the advantage of the finite difference method is even more pronounced.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 72
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An improvement of option pricing using the Finite difference method
    Svabova, Lucia
    Durica, Marek
    [J]. MANAGING AND MODELLING OF FINANCIAL RISKS: 7TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, PTS I-III, 2014, : 799 - 806
  • [2] EXCHANGE OPTION PRICING USING THE FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD
    Svabova, Lucia
    [J]. FINANCE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE, 2013, : 782 - 789
  • [3] Using the Finite Difference Method for Chooser Option Pricing
    Svabova, Lucia
    Durica, Marek
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF FIRMS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: 9TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, PTS I-III, 2013, : 943 - 950
  • [4] Convergence of the mimetic finite difference and fitted mimetic finite difference method for options pricing
    Attipoe, David Sena
    Tambue, Antoine
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2021, 401 (401)
  • [5] Compact finite difference method for American option pricing
    Zhao, Jichao
    Davison, Matt
    Corless, Robert M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2007, 206 (01) : 306 - 321
  • [6] Pricing American options using a space-time adaptive finite difference method
    Persson, Jonas
    von Sydow, Lina
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2010, 80 (09) : 1922 - 1935
  • [7] A Hybrid Monte Carlo and Finite Difference Method for Option Pricing
    Darae Jeong
    Minhyun Yoo
    Changwoo Yoo
    Junseok Kim
    [J]. Computational Economics, 2019, 53 : 111 - 124
  • [8] A Hybrid Monte Carlo and Finite Difference Method for Option Pricing
    Jeong, Darae
    Yoo, Minhyun
    Yoo, Changwoo
    Kim, Junseok
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 53 (01) : 111 - 124
  • [9] Pricing the Default Option of Inflation-Indexed Mortgages Using Explicit Finite Difference Method
    Erol, Isil
    Patel, Kanak
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REAL ESTATE REVIEW, 2007, 10 (01): : 48 - 92
  • [10] Finite difference method by using Mathematica
    Mikhailov, M.D.
    [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1994, 37 (SUPPL 1) : 375 - 379