Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals

被引:33
|
作者
Brown, Ted [1 ]
Gutman, Sharon A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth Care, Dept Occupat Therapy, Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Vic 3199, Australia
[2] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Programs Occupat Therapy, New York, NY USA
关键词
Authors; impact factor; journals; journal ranks; metrics; peer review; publications; quality scores; QUALITY METRICS; SCIENCE; WEB;
D O I
10.1080/11038128.2018.1473489
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Journals are currently assessed and ranked using a number of different quantitative performance metrics. Aim: To compare and correlate the publication metrics of English-language occupational therapy journals published in 2015. Method: Bibliometric data was sourced for 14 English-language occupational therapy journals including the Journal Citations Report (JCR) 2-year impact factor (IF), Eigenfactor Score (EFS), Article Influence Score (AIS), Scopus Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), Scopus Citescore, and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) score. The JCR, Scopus, and SJR 2015 bibliometric data were correlated. Results: The top six English-language occupational therapy journals in relation to JCR IF, EFS, AIS, SNIP, Citescore, SJR score, and SJR IIF were AJOT, AOTJ, POPT, CJOT, SJOT, and BJOT. JCR IF, EFS, JCR AIS, SNIP, Citescore, SJR score and SJR IIF were all significantly correlated with coefficients ranging from 0.751 to 0.961 (p < 0.05; p < 0.01). The calculated SJR IIF was on average 0.335 larger than the JCR IFs reported. Conclusions: The findings indicate that the range of available bibliometric measures should be used collectively to yield a more comprehensive assessment of journal and article rankings rather than the singular use of IF scores that currently and frequently occurs in many jurisdictions.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 483
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条