Research Scholarly Productivity of Universities: From the Perspective of Knowledge Transfer

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Wei'e [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Zhijiang, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
knowledge transfer; research scholarly productivity; universities; correlation and regression analysis; total effect; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Knowledge transfer acts as essential mediator to build research scholarly productivity of university faculty. However, the effects that knowledge transfer takes on research scholarly productivity of universities are still quite ambiguous, which results in ignorance of procedural concern about how knowledge transfer promotes research scholarly productivity through interaction and synergy between university faculty and specific knowledge users (receivers). Therefore, we proposed a conceptual model and 13 hypotheses, which illustrate the elements influencing knowledge transfer while university faculty engage in research work and make contribution to research scholarly productivity. Later, correlation and regression analysis were done to verify the model and hypotheses, and the statistical results indicate: the processes of "conduct research work" (knowledge transmit) and "absorb research outcome" (knowledge accept) pose the first and second greatest total effects on research scholarly productivity, which implies university faculty should pay high attention to the procedural management while making research; "communication environment" takes the third place to influence research scholarly productivity, which suggests building proper communication environment for knowledge transmission by university faculty and absorption by specific knowledge receivers is indirectly important to the level of research scholarly productivity; the last but not the least, an unexpected finding that "knowledge characteristics" (complexity) does exert direct effect on research scholarly productivity, which probably reveals university faculty is eager to grasp open opportunities and difficult challenges-the more complex the knowledge, the stronger willing to undertake research and transfer knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 454
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Universities' functions in knowledge transfer: a geographical perspective
    Fromhold-Eisebith, Martina
    Werker, Claudia
    [J]. ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2013, 51 (03): : 621 - 643
  • [2] Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: a geographical perspective
    Martina Fromhold-Eisebith
    Claudia Werker
    [J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2013, 51 : 621 - 643
  • [3] Research and knowledge transfer performance in Colombian universities
    Barra C.
    Castro-Peña M.Y.
    Coello J.G.
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2024, 58 (1) : 77 - 96
  • [4] Research on the Mechanism and Channels of Universities' Knowledge Transfer
    Shi Qinfen
    Wu Jei
    Wang Jiangang
    Zhang Yunhua
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (MSE 2010), VOL 1, 2010, : 202 - 205
  • [5] Knowledge transfer from universities to companies
    Betancur-Amariles, Jorge Henry
    Rodriguez-Santana, Gaston Dario
    Garces-Bolivar, Jhon Fredy
    [J]. TECNOLOGIA EN MARCHA, 2023, 36
  • [6] Research on Effectiveness of Technology Transfer from a Knowledge Based perspective
    Gunsel, Ayse
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2015, 207 : 777 - 785
  • [7] Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities
    Hewitt-Dundas, Nola
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (02) : 262 - 275
  • [8] UNIVERSITIES AND KNOWLEDGE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF EXCELLENCE AND COMPETITIVENESS
    Miron, Dumitru
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, VOL 2, 2009, : 4 - 7
  • [9] International differences of productivity in scholarly management knowledge
    Gantman, Ernesto R.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 80 (01) : 153 - 165
  • [10] International differences of productivity in scholarly management knowledge
    Ernesto R. Gantman
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80 : 153 - 165