Telemedicine in Germany. Status, Barriers, Perspectives

被引:36
|
作者
Brauns, H. -J. [1 ]
Loos, Wolfgang [2 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Gesell Telemed, Vorstandsvorsitzender, Berlin, Germany
[2] Geschaftsfuhrendes Vorstandsmitglied DGTelemed, D-12681 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Health care; Telemedicine; Basic conditions; User certificate; DGTelemed;
D O I
10.1007/s00103-015-2223-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Telemedicine as a subject has reached politics, doctors and patients, but it has still not been able to make the leap from research, development, and testing into real practice. This is generally because of the great barriers to implementation, mainly the lack of telematics infrastructure and of payment regulations in Germany. Telemedicine projects are mainly isolated applications and it has not been possible to integrate them in to nationwide regular health services. Other challenges along the path to standard care include that research-based small-medium enterprise (SME) companies usually face high barriers hindering access to this market, because it is imposible for them to finance all the required evidence-based studies to verify the medical benefits and the econimic efficiency. Additionally, a high market nontransparency is noted. However, the signs of progress are visible, e.g., the E-health initiative of the German government or recent legislative initiatives. However, long processes are observed that do not facilitate the use of telemedicine. Although some federal states, e.g., North Rhine Westphalia, Bavaria, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, and Saxony, show exemplary activities, there are still many white areas on the telemedicine map of Germany. The road to standard care will be long, but is not unattainable. The reasons for supporting telemedicine are still strong. The future development of telemedicine applications will contribute to sustainable and high-quality patient care in Germany.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1068 / 1073
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carriers with barriers: Women chemists in Germany.
    Schwarzl, SM
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 226 : U36 - U37
  • [2] Proctology in Germany. Status quo
    Strittmatter, B.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2012, 34 (06) : 417 - 421
  • [3] Hypertensiology in Germany. Status and perspectives [Hypertensiologie in Deutschland. Stand und perspektiven]
    Rahn K.H.
    Der Nephrologe, 2007, 2 (6): : 406 - 409
  • [4] Describe - Understanding - Interpreting: Status and Perspectives of International and Intercultural Comparative Education in Germany.
    Allemann-Ghionda, Cristina
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGIK, 2010, 56 (02): : 288 - 291
  • [5] Telemedicine projects in rural areas of Germany. A systematic evaluation with the "Model for Assessment of Telemedicine"
    Allner, Raphael
    Wilfling, Denise
    Kidholm, Kristian
    Steinhaeuser, Jost
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2019, 141 : 89 - 95
  • [6] Mortality statistics in Germany. Problems and perspectives
    Schelhase, T.
    Weber, S.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2007, 50 (07) : 969 - 976
  • [7] Restorative status and needs in Saxony/Germany.
    Wolf, B
    Walter, M
    Reiger, C
    Schütte, U
    Boening, K
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 706 - 706
  • [8] Trauma centers in Germany.: Status report
    Kuehne, C. A.
    Ruchholtz, S.
    Buschmann, C.
    Sturm, J.
    Lackner, C. K.
    Wentzensen, A.
    Bouillon, B.
    Weber, M.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2006, 109 (05): : 357 - 366
  • [9] Status quo and Potential of Telemedicine in Germany
    Beckers, Rainer
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2017, 52 (02): : 90 - 91
  • [10] Telemedicine in Germany: status, chances and limits
    Klar, R.
    Pelikan, E.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2009, 52 (03) : 263 - 269