Assessment of surface winds over the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Ocean sectors of the Southern Ocean in CMIP5 models: historical bias, forcing response, and state dependence

被引:166
|
作者
Bracegirdle, Thomas J. [1 ]
Shuckburgh, Emily [1 ]
Sallee, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Wang, Zhaomin [2 ]
Meijers, Andrew J. S. [1 ]
Bruneau, Nicolas [1 ]
Phillips, Tony [1 ]
Wilcox, Laura J. [3 ]
机构
[1] British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Marine Sci, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, NCAS Climate, Reading RG6 2AH, Berks, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
HEMISPHERE ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION; ANNULAR MODE; SEA-ICE; TEMPERATURE; VARIABILITY; STRESS;
D O I
10.1002/jgrd.50153
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
An assessment of the fifth Coupled Models Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) models' simulation of the near-surface westerly wind jet position and strength over the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific sectors of the Southern Ocean is presented. Compared with reanalysis climatologies there is an equatorward bias of 3.3 degrees (inter-model standard deviation of +/- 1.9 degrees) in the ensemble mean position of the zonal mean jet. The ensemble mean strength is biased slightly too weak, with the largest biases over the Pacific sector (-1.4 +/- 1.2 m/s, -19%). An analysis of atmosphere-only (AMIP) experiments indicates that 28% of the zonal mean position bias comes from coupling of the ocean/ice models to the atmosphere. The response to future emissions scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) is characterized by two phases: (i) the period of most rapid ozone recovery (2000-2049) during which there is insignificant change in summer; and (ii) the period 2050-2098 during which RCP4.5 simulations show no significant change but RCP8.5 simulations show poleward shifts (0.33, 0.18 and 0.27 degrees/decade over the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific sectors, respectively), and increases in strength (0.07, 0.08 and 0.15 m/s/decade, respectively). The models with larger equatorward position biases generally show larger poleward shifts (i. e. state dependence). This inter-model relationship is strongest over the Pacific sector (r = -0.91) and weakest over the Atlantic sector (r = -0.39). An assessment of jet structure shows that over the Atlantic sector jet shift is not clearly linked to indices of jet structure whereas over the Pacific sector the distance between the sub-polar and sub-tropical westerly jets appears to be important. Citation: Bracegirdle, T. J., E. Shuckburgh, J.-B. Sallee, Z. Wang, A. J. S. Meijers, N. Bruneau, T. Phillips, and L. J. Wilcox (2013), Assessment of surface winds over the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Ocean sectors of the Southern Ocean in CMIP5 models: historical bias, forcing response, and state dependence, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 547 562, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50153.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 562
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Southern Ocean mixed-layer depths in CMIP5 models: Historical bias and forcing response
    Sallee, J. -B.
    Shuckburgh, E.
    Bruneau, N.
    Meijers, A. J. S.
    Bracegirdle, T. J.
    Wang, Z.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2013, 118 (04) : 1845 - 1862
  • [2] Assessment of Southern Ocean water mass circulation and characteristics in CMIP5 models: Historical bias and forcing response
    Sallee, J. -B.
    Shuckburgh, E.
    Bruneau, N.
    Meijers, A. J. S.
    Bracegirdle, T. J.
    Wang, Z.
    Roy, T.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2013, 118 (04) : 1830 - 1844
  • [3] Assessment of western Indian Ocean SST bias of CMIP5 models
    Fathrio, Ibnu
    Iizuka, Satoshi
    Manda, Atsuyoshi
    Kodama, Yasu-Masa
    Ishida, Sachinobu
    Moteki, Qoosaku
    Yamada, Hiroyuki
    Tachibana, Yoshihiro
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2017, 122 (04) : 3123 - 3140
  • [4] The Pacific-Indian Ocean associated mode in CMIP5 models
    Yang, Minghao
    Li, Xin
    Shi, Weilai
    Zhang, Chao
    Zhang, Jianqi
    OCEAN SCIENCE, 2020, 16 (02) : 469 - 482
  • [5] Evaluation and bias correction of global climate models in the CMIP5 over the Indian Ocean region
    Soumya Mohan
    Prasad K. Bhaskaran
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191
  • [6] Evaluation and bias correction of global climate models in the CMIP5 over the Indian Ocean region
    Mohan, Soumya
    Bhaskaran, Prasad K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (Suppl 3)
  • [7] Evaluation of CMIP5 models on sea surface salinity in the Indian Ocean
    Fathrio, Ibnu
    Manda, Atsuyoshi
    Iizuka, Satoshi
    Kodama, Yasu-Masa
    Ishida, Sachinobu
    3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LAPAN-IPB SATELLITE FOR FOOD SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2016, 2017, 54
  • [8] Assessment of the Southern Ocean Sea Surface Temperature Biases in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Gao, Zhen
    Zhao, Shichang
    Liu, Qinyu
    Long, Shang-Min
    Sun, Shantong
    JOURNAL OF OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA, 2024, 23 (05) : 1135 - 1150
  • [9] Assessment of the Southern Ocean Sea Surface Temperature Biases in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    GAO Zhen
    ZHAO Shichang
    LIU Qinyu
    LONG ShangMin
    SUN Shantong
    Journal of Ocean University of China, 2024, 23 (05) : 1135 - 1150
  • [10] MJO Propagation over the Indian Ocean and Western Pacific in CMIP5 Models: Roles of Background States
    Chen, Guiwan
    Ling, Jian
    Zhang, Yuanwen
    Wang, Xin
    Li, Chongyin
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (03) : 955 - 973