COMPUTER PROGRAMMING ACCEPTANCE BY STUDENTS IN HIGHER ARTS AND DESIGN EDUCATION

被引:0
|
作者
Morais, E. [1 ]
Morais, C. [1 ]
Paiva, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Porto, Portugal
关键词
higher education; arts education; design education; technology acceptance; utaut model; creative code; computer programming; student survey; UNIFIED THEORY; TECHNOLOGY; METAANALYSIS; UTAUT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Approximately half the students enrolled in the many arts and design undergraduate programmes offered by Portuguese public higher education institutions will learn or have an opportunity to learn about computer programming while taking their degree. A preliminary study to assess those students' attitudes and opinions towards the subject of programming was conducted using an online survey based on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). An opportunity sample of 187 students participated, and 41.2% reported proficiency in some form of computer programming, 35.8% reported to be currently learning, and only 23% reported no knowledge of the subject. Expectations of utility, effortlessness and peer approval were found to positively correlate with students' intention to program or, in the case of students without such knowledge, an intention to learn computer programming. Students currently learning to code reported greater anxiety about the subject overall, and those reporting greater anxiety had the least intention to program in the future. Female students were also more likely to ascribe greater anxiety to the perspective of programming computers, as did younger students in general. Mitigating anxiety thus presents a challenge to educators engaged with computer programming, alongside adapting syllabi and pedagogies as to reduce the gender imbalance in programming acceptance and use.
引用
收藏
页码:2058 / 2065
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE PERSPECTIVE OF HIGHER ARTS AND DESIGN EDUCATORS ON TEACHING COMPUTER PROGRAMMING
    Morais, E.
    Morais, C.
    Paiva, J.
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 2043 - 2050
  • [3] Students' Acceptance of Gamification in Higher Education
    Chung, Chih-Hung
    Shen, Chunyi
    Qiu, Yu-Zhen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME-BASED LEARNING, 2019, 9 (02) : 1 - 19
  • [4] Teaching Programming in the Higher Education not for Engineering Students
    Kiss, Gabor
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2013, 103 : 922 - 927
  • [5] Wiki acceptance by university students to improve collaboration in higher education
    Cilliers, Liezel
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 54 (05) : 485 - 493
  • [6] Learning Management System Acceptance Behaviour of Students in Higher Education
    Nirban, Virendra Singh
    Chasul
    [J]. 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOOC, INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION (MITE), 2014, : 108 - 111
  • [7] Examining Students' Acceptance of Internet of Things Technology in Higher Education
    Militaru, Gheorghe
    Simion, Cristina Petronela
    Deselnicu, Dana
    Ioanid, Alexandra
    Niculescu, Cristian
    [J]. VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, AND GLOBAL GROWTH, VOLS I-IX, 2017, 2017, : 3615 - 3623
  • [8] The Inclusion of Python']Python as Introductory Computer Programming in the Preparatory Year of Higher Education: Modeling for Students' Perceptions
    Alsaggaf, Wafaa
    Alkhuraiji, Samar
    Baaqeel, Hanan
    Brdesee, Hani
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2022, 22 (03): : 565 - 574
  • [9] Students' Performances in Computer Programming of Higher Education for Sustainable Development: The Effects of a Peer-Evaluation System
    Hsiao, Tsung-Chih
    Chuang, Ya-Hsueh
    Chen, Tzer-Long
    Chang, Chien-Yun
    Chen, Chih-Cheng
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [10] The study of basic computer education reform for arts students in college
    Zhao Xiaoxia
    Pan Shengmin
    Lei Jinhui
    [J]. Advanced Computer Technology, New Education, Proceedings, 2007, : 1282 - 1284