Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure

被引:920
|
作者
Cutter, GR
Baier, ML
Rudick, RA
Cookfair, DL
Fischer, JS
Petkau, J
Syndulko, K
Weinshenker, BG
Antel, JP
Confavreux, C
Ellison, GW
Lublin, F
Miller, AE
Rao, SM
Reingold, S
Thompson, A
Willoughby, E
机构
[1] AMC Canc Res Ctr, Ctr Res Methodol & Biometr, Lakewood, CO USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Mellen Ctr Multiple Sclerosis Treatment & Res, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Neurol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[4] Maimonides Hosp, Brooklyn, NY 11219 USA
[5] Vet Adm Wadsworth Hosp Ctr, Neurol Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90073 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[7] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Neurol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[8] Allegheny Univ Hlth Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[9] MCW Clin Froedtert, Sect Neuropsychol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[10] Univ British Columbia, Dept Stat, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
[11] Montreal Neurol Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[12] Hop Antiquaille, Neurol Serv, Lyon, France
[13] UCL Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, London WC1N 3BG, England
[14] Auckland Hosp, Dept Neurol, Auckland, New Zealand
[15] Natl Multiple Sclerosis Soc, Res Programs, New York, NY USA
关键词
multiple sclerosis clinical outcome measure;
D O I
10.1093/brain/122.5.871
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The primary clinical outcome measure for evaluating multiple sclerosis in clinical trials has been Kurtzke's expanded disability status scale (EDSS). New therapies appear to favourably impact the course of multiple sclerosis and render continued use of placebo control groups more difficult. Consequently, future trials are likely to compare active treatment groups which will most probably require increased sample sizes in order to detect therapeutic efficacy. Because more responsive outcome measures will be needed for active arm comparison studies, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society's Advisory Committee on Cinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis appointed a Task Force that was charged with developing improved clinical outcome measures. This Task Force acquired contemporary clinical trial and historical multiple sclerosis data for meta-analyses of primary and secondary outcome assessments to provide a basis for recommending a new outcome measure. A composite measure encompassing the major clinical dimensions of arm, leg and cognitive function was identified and termed the multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC). The MSFC consists of three objective quantitative tests of neurological function which are easy to administer. Change in this MSFC over the first year of observation predicted subsequent change in the EDSS, suggesting that the MSFC is more sensitive to change than the EDSS, This paper provides details concerning the development and testing of the MSFC.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 882
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite: a new clinical outcome measure for multiple sclerosis
    Rudick, RA
    Cutter, G
    Reinold, S
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2002, 8 (05): : 359 - 365
  • [2] Use of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite as an outcome measure in a phase 3 clinical trial
    Cohen, JA
    Cutter, GR
    Fischer, JS
    Goodman, AD
    Heidenreich, FR
    Jak, AJ
    Kniker, JE
    Kooijmans, MF
    Lull, JM
    Sandrock, AW
    Simon, JH
    Simonian, NA
    Whitaker, JN
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) : 961 - 967
  • [3] The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment
    Fischer, JS
    Rudick, RA
    Cutter, GR
    Reingold, SC
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 1999, 5 (04) : 244 - 250
  • [4] Utilization of the multiple sclerosis functional composite as an outcome measure in the phase 3 trial of interferon beta-1a (Avonex®) in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (IMPACT)
    Cohen, JA
    Cutter, GC
    Simonian, NA
    Goodman, AD
    Heidenreich, FR
    Simon, JH
    Whitaker, JN
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (06) : A548 - A549
  • [5] Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis - The importance of the outcome measure
    Zajicek, J
    Thompson, A
    Hobart, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 75 (08): : 1215 - 1215
  • [6] The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite A clinically meaningful measure of disability
    Polman, Chris H.
    Rudick, Richard A.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2010, 74 (17) : S8 - S15
  • [7] The measure tells the tale: Clinical outcome measures in multiple sclerosis
    Hulst, Hanneke E.
    Thompson, Alan J.
    Geurts, Jeroen J. G.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (05) : 626 - 627
  • [8] Neuropsychiatric assessment as a secondary outcome measure in a multiple sclerosis IVIg trial
    Barak, Y
    Achiron, A
    Gabbay, U
    Gilad, R
    SarovaPinhas, I
    Goldhammer, Y
    Gornish, M
    Noy, S
    Elizur, A
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND RELATED SCIENCES, 1996, 33 (04): : 266 - 267
  • [9] Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC) standardized in Brazilian population
    Tilbery, CP
    Mendes, MF
    Thomaz, RB
    de Oliveira, BES
    Kelian, GLR
    Busch, R
    Miranda, PPC
    Caleffi, P
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2005, 63 (01) : 127 - 132
  • [10] Development of the Brazilian version of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC-BCTRIMS): pilot study
    Haase, VG
    Lima, ED
    Lacerda, SS
    Lana-Peixoto, MA
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2004, 62 (2A) : 363 - 370